Our concise best monitor for eye strain buying guide cuts through the clutter of fake reviews and insufficient expert analysis by digging into data and real-world testing. We scrutinized 286489 reviews (customer & expert) from 196 computer monitors, evaluating essential performance aspects like input lag and contrast ratio. Our research revealed that 71% of experts fall short in their testing, but we’ve identified the credible few. This meticulous process has allowed us to curate a list of 6 top-performing monitors for your eyes, providing you with the confidence to make an informed decision based on reliable test data and genuine insights.
While our guide highlights monitors designed to reduce eye strain, if you already have an excellent computer monitor and aren’t looking to replace it, consider trying the best blue-light blocking glasses to see if they help reduce eye fatigue and improve comfort during prolonged use.
Below is our list of the 6 best monitors for your eyes.
How Did We Rank the Best Monitor for Eye Strain?
We’ve redefined computer monitor buying guides, setting us apart from any other site on the planet. Our unique approach leverages a comprehensive dataset from 200+ trusted sites, focusing on key testing metrics (2 required) and 2 specifications to rank the top-rated computer monitors for eye strain and ensure our recommendations meet your specific needs. Our commitment to unbiased reviews is powered by our ‘True Score’ system, targeting low quality and fake reviews. When you shop through our links, you’re backing our mission. Dive deeper to see how.
🛠️ Minimum Specifications
- Must have flicker-free tech
- Must have a blue light filter
🧪 Test Criteria
- Brightness: Equal to or greater than 300 nits, ensuring a bright and clear display under any lighting conditions.
- Reflections: A reflection percentage of less than 5% of the total light emitted ensures optimal performance across a wide range of lighting environments, enhancing overall viewing pleasure.
Latest Updates
- 04/30/2024: Republished the list to include the best monitors for eye strain based on our True Score system.
Top Monitor for Eye Strain For 2024
Prices accurate at the time of publishing
Best Overall
Runner Up
Best Value
Best Budget
Best Mid-Range
Premium Pick
Asus ROG PG27AQDM
Best For Vertical
The Asus ROG PG27AQDM, with its reflectance rate, refresh rate, response time, and eye-care features, offers excellent performance and comfort. Ideal for professionals and gamers, its cost is justified by its visibility and minimal eye strain.
True Score
878910Experts
906kCustomers
Absolutely Fresh
SAVE $90$899.00$809.00Snapshot
Reasons to Buy
- Stellar Picture Quality
- Fast Response Time
- Low Input Lag
- High Refresh Rate and VRR Support
- Wide Viewing Angles
Reasons to Avoid
- No HDMI 2.1 Support
- Low Overall Brightness
Specifications
Aspect Ratio 16:9 Available Inputs 3.5mm, DisplayPort, HDMI, USB Bluelight Filter Yes Built-In Speakers Yes Built-In Webcam No Curved Screen No Display Type LED Flicker Free Yes HDMI Inputs 2 HDR Format HDR10 High Dynamic Range (HDR) Yes Max Resolution 2560 x 1440 Panel Type OLED Refresh Rate 240 Hz Response Time 0.03 ms Rotating Screen Yes Screen size 26.5" Sync Technology AMD FreeSync, G-Sync All Specs
Test Results
Brightness (nits) 311 Contrast Ratio (as ratio, x:1) 0 Color Gamut/Accuracy % (DCI P3 xy) 95 Color Gamut/Accuracy % (DCI P3 uv) 0 Color Gamut % (Adobe RGB Coverage xy) 90 Color Gamut % (sRGB Coverage xy) 100 All Retailers
$809.00$899Save $90Availability
Free Shipping
Yes
$869.99Availability
In StockFree Shipping
No
Our Verdict
If you are a professional seeking a monitor that excels in productivity tasks without straining your eyes, or if you value a smooth, blur-free viewing experience, then the Asus ROG PG27AQDM is a reliable choice. Despite being the most expensive, it offers a good value for the performance it delivers. The monitor’s reflectance rate is minimal at 2.0%, which means less light is reflected off the screen, enhancing visibility and further reducing eye strain in brightly lit environments.
Compared to the Viewsonic XG2431, the Asus ROG PG27AQDM has a slightly lower brightness (311.2 nits vs. 354.195 nits), but it compensates for this with a lower input lag of 13.9 ms. This makes it great for dynamic scenes while watching indoors with limited direct sunlight.
Its impressive refresh rate of 240.0 Hz and response time of 2.13 ms ensure a smooth viewing experience. This is beneficial for fast-paced applications, where rapid screen updates can make a significant difference. The Asus ROG PG27AQDM is equipped with a blue light filter and flicker-free technology, both of which are essential for reducing eye strain during prolonged use. The OLED panel type offers true blacks and a high contrast ratio, enhancing the image quality and making the visuals less harsh on the eyes.
The Asus ROG PG27AQDM provides excellent value for its premium tag. Its ability to handle reflections, refresh rate, response time, and eye-care technologies make it a top choice for users who prioritize both performance and eye comfort. The price and lower brightness compromise here, but whether you’re a professional, a gamer, or a general user, this monitor delivers a remarkable and comfortable viewing experience.
Best Overall
Runner Up
Best Value
Best Budget
Best Mid-Range
Premium Pick
HP OMEN 27QS
Best For Business
The HP OMEN 27QS has low input lag, high brightness, and a 240Hz refresh rate, making it a great budget pick for gaming and bright environments. Its reflectance rate and DCI-P3 coverage ensure good visibility and vibrant colors.
True Score
85844Experts
91874Customers
Absolutely Fresh
$242.00Snapshot
Reasons to Buy
- Good Image quality
- Low response time
- Low input lag
- High refresh rate
Reasons to Avoid
- Low contrast ratio
Specifications
Aspect Ratio 16:9 Available Inputs 3.5mm, DisplayPort, HDMI, USB Bluelight Filter Yes Built-In Speakers Yes Built-In Webcam No Curved Screen No Display Type LED Flicker Free Yes HDMI Inputs 2 HDR Format HDR10, HDR400 High Dynamic Range (HDR) Yes Max Resolution 2560 x 1440 Panel Type IPS Refresh Rate 240 Hz Response Time 1 ms Rotating Screen Yes Screen size 27" Sync Technology AMD FreeSync Premium, G-Sync All Specs
Test Results
Brightness (nits) 390 Contrast Ratio (as ratio, x:1) 1,014 Color Gamut/Accuracy % (DCI P3 xy) 94 Color Gamut/Accuracy % (DCI P3 uv) 0 Color Gamut % (Adobe RGB Coverage xy) 86 Color Gamut % (sRGB Coverage xy) 100 All Retailers
- $242.00
Availability
In StockFree Shipping
No 
$429.99Availability
In StockFree Shipping
Yes- $564.29
Availability
In StockFree Shipping
No
Our Verdict
If you’re on a budget but want a monitor that will help reduce eye strain, the HP OMEN 27QS is a fantastic monitor with an impressive feature set. It has a best-in-class input lag, clocking in at a swift 8.5ms. If you’re going to use it for intense applications or gaming, this feature ensures extreme responsiveness, guaranteeing no lagging or delays. Its response time, while not the fastest on the list, is still a decent 4.2ms, and it has a 240Hz refresh rate. If crisp and blur-free content matters most to you, this feature ensures smooth motion handling.
Compared to the Viewsonic XG2431, which sits above it, the HP OMEN 27QS pulls ahead with its higher brightness of 389.5 nits. If you need to set up your monitor in a bright room or have a ton of ambient light to deal with, this feature enhances visibility and provides vivid images. Additionally, it has a good contrast ratio of 1014:1, contributing to a crisper image and more vivid colors.
Its 4.8% reflectance rate effectively manages ambient light reflections, ensuring good visibility and comfort. The 94.40% DCI-P3 coverage also guarantees rich and accurate color reproduction, making it ideal for color-critical applications and an immersive viewing experience.
It’s a superb choice if you want high performance and visual comfort without breaking the bank. Though it doesn’t have the lowest reflectance rate, so there will still be some glare, its low input lag, high brightness, and good contrast ratio make it an impressive contender in our lineup. Its value for money further enhances its appeal, making it an excellent choice for a variety of users.
Best Overall
Runner Up
Best Value
Best Budget
Best Mid-Range
Premium Pick
Viewsonic XG2431
The Viewsonic XG2431 is suited for bright environments thanks to its high brightness, blue light filter, and flicker-free technology. Its lower contrast ratio and DCI-P3 color coverage make it better for producing vibrant visuals for general use.
True Score
85846Experts
91983Customers
Absolutely Fresh
SAVE $40$279.99$239.99Snapshot
Reasons to Buy
- Better-than-average response time
- Low input lag
- 240Hz native refresh rate
- Good viewing angles
Reasons to Avoid
- Sub-par image quality
Specifications
Aspect Ratio 16:9 Available Inputs 3.5mm, DisplayPort, HDMI, USB Bluelight Filter Yes Built-In Speakers Yes Built-In Webcam No Curved Screen No Display Type LCD Flicker Free Yes HDMI Inputs 2 HDR Format HDR10, HDR400 High Dynamic Range (HDR) Yes Max Resolution 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) Panel Type IPS Refresh Rate 240 Hz Response Time 1 ms Rotating Screen Yes Screen size 23.8" Sync Technology AMD FreeSync Premium All Specs
Test Results
Brightness (nits) 354 Contrast Ratio (as ratio, x:1) 823 Color Gamut/Accuracy % (DCI P3 xy) 74 Color Gamut/Accuracy % (DCI P3 uv) 0 Color Gamut % (Adobe RGB Coverage xy) 76 Color Gamut % (sRGB Coverage xy) 101 All Retailers
- $239.99$280Save $40
Availability
In StockFree Shipping
Yes - $259.99$280Save $20
Availability
In StockFree Shipping
Yes - $259.99$452Save $192
Availability
In StockFree Shipping
No
Our Verdict
If you work in a bright room or have a lot of ambient light, the Viewsonic XG2431, with its great brightness of 354.195 nits, is the one for you. This feature, combined with a blue light filter and flicker-free technology, helps this monitor minimize eye fatigue. It features an okay contrast ratio of 822.65:1, but it’s on the lower side, affecting the depth and richness of visuals, though it may suffice for general use.
It offers a lower DCI-P3 coverage of 73.50%, meaning it can still provide a wide range of colors, delivering vibrant visuals suitable for general use, but it may not be suited for color-critical tasks. It has a 4.9% reflectance rate, which can handle ambient light well, ensuring decent screen visibility and comfort for users in various lighting conditions. It’s priced significantly lower than the Asus ROG PG27AQDM, making it a great value considering its high refresh rate of 240 Hz and HDR10 support, which enhances the visual experience with better contrast and color depth.
The Viewsonic XG2431 has a higher brightness level than the HP OMEN 27QS, enhancing your visual experience. However, it has a slightly higher input lag at 16.9 ms and a slower response time of 5.0 ms. This can affect fast-paced activities but is still acceptable for most users.
With its high brightness and features that combat eye fatigue, it’s ideal for bright environments and offers value at a lower price point. While the compromise is mainly its slower response time and modest DCI-P3 color coverage, they are minor for most users. Its ergonomic design and performance make it a versatile and appealing choice for a wide range of applications.
Did you know 71% of computer monitor reviewers are untrustworthy?
Our research found only 33 of 110+ computer monitor reviewers as of May 2024 can be trusted. This is why Gadget Review is committed calculating the most accurate product scores on the web.
To do this, we give every computer monitor review site a Trust Score, which measures how trustworthy the site and their testing claims are. We then leverage AI & a machine learning model to combine and calculate the Trust Score with data from experts and consumers to deliver the True Score, the web’s most accurate product quality rating.
286,489Monitor Reviews Analyzed
196
Total Products Analyzed
Best Overall
Runner Up
Best Value
Best Budget
Best Mid-Range
Premium Pick
Corsair Xeneon 27QHD240
Best For 27-Inch
The Corsair Xeneon 27QHD240 has a great response time, contrast ratio, and reflectance rate, minimizing glare and maximizing vibrance and smoothness for color-critical work, gaming and video playback.
True Score
838310Experts
88330Customers
Absolutely Fresh
SAVE $100$999.99$899.99Snapshot
Reasons to Buy
- Excellent OLED Picture Quality
- Ultra-Fast Response Time
- Low Input Lag
- High Refresh Rate and VRR Support
Reasons to Avoid
- Lower Peak Brightness Levels
- Higher Input Lag with Different Refresh Rates
- Potential OLED Burn-In
Specifications
Available Inputs 3.5mm, DisplayPort, HDMI, USB Bluelight Filter Yes Built-In Speakers No Built-In Webcam No Curved Screen No Display Type OLED Flicker Free Yes HDMI Inputs 2 HDR Format HDR10 High Dynamic Range (HDR) Yes Max Resolution 2560 x 1440 Panel Type OLED Refresh Rate 240 Hz Response Time 0.03 ms Rotating Screen Yes Screen size 27" Sync Technology AMD FreeSync, G-Sync All Specs
Test Results
Brightness (nits) 318 Contrast Ratio (as ratio, x:1) 9,473 Color Gamut/Accuracy % (DCI P3 xy) 96 Color Gamut/Accuracy % (DCI P3 uv) 0 Color Gamut % (Adobe RGB Coverage xy) 90 Color Gamut % (sRGB Coverage xy) 107 All Retailers
- $899.99$1,000Save $100
Availability
In StockFree Shipping
Yes - $899.99$1,000Save $100
Availability
In StockFree Shipping
Yes - $1,070.84
Availability
In StockFree Shipping
No
Our Verdict
If crisp and blur-free content with minimal glare matters most to you, then the Corsair Xeneon 27QHD240, with the best-in-class response time of 0.79 ms, is an excellent solution. Along with a high refresh rate of 240 Hz, it makes it a superb choice for gaming and video playback, where quick screen transitions are required. Its input lag of 13.6 ms is generally considered good for most users and applications, including casual gaming and multimedia consumption. With an unmatched reflectance rate of 1.8%, this monitor significantly reduces glare and reflections, enhancing visibility and eye comfort in brightly lit environments.
The OLED monitor has a best-in-class contrast ratio of 9,473:1, meaning it can display extremely deep blacks and bright whites, enhancing the overall image quality with more vivid and detailed visuals. When compared to the HP OMEN 27QS, the Corsair Xeneon 27QHD240 has a lower brightness, measuring 317.53 nits, but it significantly outperforms it with its faster response time. Its brightness is still good enough for bright indoor rooms, though probably not direct sunlight.
It boasts a best-in-class 96.10% DCI-P3 coverage, offering wide and accurate color reproduction, ideal for professionals in photography, video editing, and design who require true-to-life colors. It also includes features such as a blue light filter and flicker-free technology, which are important for reducing eye strain. It lacks built-in speakers, implying the need for external audio solutions.
If you’re willing to invest in an external audio solution, the Corsair could be an excellent choice. Despite its premium price, it offers the best anti-glare ability, response time, and high contrast, which may justify the cost if you’re a professional who needs these specific features.
DON’T SEE WHAT YOU’RE LOOKING FOR?
When choosing a monitor, understanding the differences between CRT monitors and modern displays is crucial. For eye health, the LCD vs LED monitors for eyes comparison shows that LED screens generally offer better backlighting and less strain. For specific tasks, the best photo editing monitor and top monitors for graphic design provide superior color accuracy, while an excellent HDR monitor enhances contrast, making it ideal for watching movies and detailed gaming visuals.
For gamers, selecting the best gaming monitor, especially focusing on 1080p gaming monitors, can significantly improve your experience with faster response times and crisp visuals. Always consider if a monitor warranty worth it to protect your investment in these high-performance electronics.
Best Overall
Runner Up
Best Value
Best Budget
Best Mid-Range
Premium Pick
Dell S2722QC
Best For Cheap
The Dell S2722QC is ideal for bright environments. It combines high brightness with a good reflection rate for clear visibility. It features a responsive input lag, sufficient refresh rate, and good response time for minimal motion blur, enhancing productivity.
True Score
83813Experts
882kCustomers
Absolutely Fresh
SAVE $100$399.99$299.99Snapshot
Reasons to Buy
- 4K screen resolution delivers high picture quality
- Supports Variable Refresh Rate technology
- Thin top and side frame for multi-monitor setup
- Great ergonomics
- Wide viewing angles
Reasons to Avoid
- Low 60Hz refresh rate
- No HDMI 2.1 ports
- Low contrast ratio
Specifications
Available Inputs 3.5mm, HDMI, USB Bluelight Filter Yes Built-In Speakers Yes Built-In Webcam No Curved Screen No Display Type IPS Flicker Free Yes HDMI Inputs 2 HDR Format HDR10 High Dynamic Range (HDR) Yes Max Resolution 3840 x 2160 (4k) Panel Type IPS Refresh Rate 60 Hz Response Time 4 ms Rotating Screen Yes Screen size 27" Sync Technology AMD FreeSync, G-Sync All Specs
Test Results
Brightness (nits) 339 Contrast Ratio (as ratio, x:1) 1,247 Color Gamut/Accuracy % (DCI P3 xy) 83 Color Gamut/Accuracy % (DCI P3 uv) 0 Color Gamut % (Adobe RGB Coverage xy) 79 Color Gamut % (sRGB Coverage xy) 100 All Retailers
- $299.99$400Save $100
Availability
In StockFree Shipping
Yes - $370.40
Availability
In StockFree Shipping
Yes - $429.99$558Save $128
Availability
In StockFree Shipping
No
Our Verdict
If you work in a brightly lit environment, the Dell S2722QC is a great pick to consider. With a brightness of 339 nits, it ensures clear visibility under various lighting conditions. It’s suitable for well-lit environments without causing excessive glare, thanks to a relatively low total reflection percentage of 4.6%.
Its input lag of 9 ms makes it a highly responsive monitor, beneficial for tasks that require quick feedback from inputs. Its refresh rate of 60 Hz is sufficient for most productivity tasks and casual gaming, ensuring a smooth and strain-free experience. Its response time of 8.3 ms minimizes motion blur, providing a more comfortable viewing experience during dynamic content viewing, making it ideal for productivity.
The 4K resolution and HDR10 support offer sharp, detailed images and a wide range of colors for an enjoyable viewing experience. It’s very similar to the Dell G2724D, and while the G2724D has a higher brightness, the S2722QC has a higher resolution for crisp, detailed visuals. Its contrast ratio of 1247:1 offers a good balance between bright and dark areas, ensuring a crisp image quality that is easy on the eyes. Its 82.90% DCI-P3 coverage provides a wide and fairly accurate color range, making it suitable for enjoying rich and vibrant visuals in general viewing scenarios. It’s equipped with a blue light filter and flicker-free technology, which are essential for reducing eye strain during prolonged use.
With its impressive brightness level, responsive input lag, and decent response time, this monitor is designed to deliver a comfortable and enjoyable viewing experience during work or play. However, its refresh rate may not meet the needs of hardcore gamers, marking a slight compromise for this otherwise stellar monitor.
Category Snapshot
Computer Monitors
- Total Brands/Products Tested
27 Brands, 196 Products
- Top 2 Brands
Dell, HP
- Price Range (Budget-Premium)
$100-$1,500
- Average True Score
74.46
- Important Test Criteria
Brightness (cd/m2)
Contrast Ratio (1000:1) - Most Trusted Testers
- Top Monitor Experts
- Typical Warranty
2 years
- Covered by Insurance
Yes – AKKO
Best Overall
Runner Up
Best Value
Best Budget
Best Mid-Range
Premium Pick
Dell G2724D
Best For Graphic Design
The Dell G2724D has a top-tier brightness, blue light filter, and flicker-free technology for eye comfort. With good contrast, manageable reflectance, and wide color coverage, it balances performance and cost-effectively.
True Score
83822Experts
88126Customers
Absolutely Fresh
SAVE $67$299.99$232.79Snapshot
Reasons to Buy
- Great image quality
- Low Input lag
- High native refresh rate
Reasons to Avoid
- Subpar contrast ratio and HDR color gamut
- Okay response time
- No HDMI 2.1 and USB ports
Specifications
Aspect Ratio 16:9 Available Inputs DisplayPort, HDMI Bluelight Filter Yes Built-In Speakers No Built-In Webcam No Curved Screen No Display Type LED Flicker Free Yes HDMI Inputs 2 HDR Format HDR10, HDR400 High Dynamic Range (HDR) Yes Max Resolution 2560 x 1440 Panel Type IPS Refresh Rate 165 Hz Response Time 1 ms Rotating Screen Yes Screen size 27" Sync Technology AMD FreeSync Premium, G-Sync, VESA Adaptive-Sync All Specs
Test Results
Brightness (nits) 432 Contrast Ratio (as ratio, x:1) 1,350 Color Gamut/Accuracy % (DCI P3 xy) 86 Color Gamut/Accuracy % (DCI P3 uv) 0 Color Gamut % (Adobe RGB Coverage xy) 82 Color Gamut % (sRGB Coverage xy) 100 All Retailers
- $232.79$300Save $67
Availability
In StockFree Shipping
Yes
Our Verdict
If you need to set up your monitor in a bright room or have a ton of ambient light to deal with, the Dell G2724D, with its best-in-class brightness of 432.0 nits, is a superb choice. This monitor ensures clear and vivid visuals even in brightly lit environments. It’s also equipped with a blue light filter and flicker-free technology, prioritizing your eye comfort during extended use. It boasts a contrast ratio of 1350:1, which is quite good for an IPS panel, contributing to better image quality and clarity.
When compared to the Corsair Xeneon 27QHD240, the Dell G2724D offers a higher brightness but has a slightly higher response time of 4.3 ms. This difference may be noticeable in very fast-paced content, but for most users, this response time ensures minimal motion blur during movies and casual gaming. In terms of input lag, it has a low 9.0 ms, which is great for a responsive user experience. The refresh rate of 165 Hz is suitable for most users, especially if you’re a casual gamer.
Its 4.8% reflectance rate effectively balances screen visibility and comfort, managing ambient light reflections well enough for most indoor environments. A monitor with 86.40% DCI-P3 coverage provides a broad spectrum of colors, offering color reproduction suitable for general media consumption.
This monitor provides a balance between performance and cost. If a bright display is your top priority and you’re on a budget, then with its solid performance, this monitor is an excellent choice to consider. It doesn’t have the deepest blacks, brightest whites, and most vibrant colors, but it’s still adequate for everyday tasks in bright rooms without breaking the bank.
Our Approach to Testing the Best Monitor for Eye Strain
We’ve redefined computer monitor buying guides, setting us apart from any other site on the planet. Our unique approach uses a comprehensive dataset from trusted sites, focusing on key testing metrics like contrast ratio, color gamut, and input lag.
We aggregate and analyze this data, ensuring our recommendations meet the specific needs. Specifically, when it comes to monitors for your eyes, they should be flicker-free and have a blue light filter. Discover our data-driven methodology for precise, reliable gaming monitor recommendations.
Which Criteria Matters for Testing Best Monitor for Eye Strain?
By focusing on these criteria (2 required), anyone can quickly and easily compare these computer monitors and how they’ll perform. This helps you make an informed decision and purchase the best monitor for your eyes.
| CRITERIA | RANGE | REQUIRED | DEFINITION |
|---|---|---|---|
| Reflections | < 5% | Yes | The total amount of light, in percentage, your monitor reflects. |
| Brightness | > 300 nits | Yes | How bright the monitor will get, usually under specific testing conditions, like 10% windows (which means 10% of the screen is a white box.) |
Our Trusted Data Sources
We looked at 110+ computer monitor reviewers and found that 33 are trustworthy (60%+ Trust Score). The three we have listed below are our most trusted for computer monitors.
- Samuel Breton – Rtings, MuckRack
- Chris Eberle – Tom’s Hardware, LinkedIn
- Tony Hoffman – PC Mag, MuckRack
Interested in a comprehensive analysis of our data sources? We’ve got you covered. Below, you’ll find a detailed list of every computer monitor review website we’ve identified, organized by their respective Trust Scores from highest to lowest. But we didn’t stop there. We’ve meticulously reviewed each publication and verified the data by checking whether the authors have bio links to MuckRack or LinkedIn. We’re committed to not only checking the facts but ensuring their veracity.
Computer Monitor Test Data & Results
1. Brightness (Nits) Test Results
Brightness is the biggest determining factor for how vivid images appear and how well a monitor is going to deal with the environment it’s placed in. Brightly lit offices will make it harder to see the screen if the brightness is too low, which degrades the image quality of anything on screen.
In most situations, we recommend a brightness of at least 200 nits, though higher is always better, as it allows the monitor to be placed in progressively brighter rooms and offices without issue. That said, 300 nits are enough to work in standard lighting conditions so that images stay vivid.
Brightness
> 300 nits
Acceptable range of performance
Definition: The difference in brightness between the whites (lit sections) and blacks (dim or unlit sections) of a monitor panel.
Units of Measurement: Nits
Tools to Measure: Luminance meter or photometer or colorimeter
Why It’s Important:
Brightness is how a monitor is able to display vivid images and overcome ambient light sources.
Brightness (in nits; higher is better)
2. Reflections % (Total Reflections) Test Results
Reflections % (Total Reflections)
< 5%
Acceptable range of performance
Definition: How much light is reflected by the screen from ambient and direct light sources.
Units of Measurement: %
Tools to Measure: Camera
Why It’s Important:
Reflections and glare ruin the image quality on screen by washing out the image itself and making it hard to see what you’re doing.
When using a monitor in any kind of room outside of one that’s pitch black, the screen is going to reflect light. As the light becomes strong, you’re likely to see more light and more glare reflect off it, but depending on the coating and screen type, this can be mitigated. Good screen coatings will keep ambient light and direct light managed by reducing the impact they have on the screen. Bad reflections handling means even weak light sources will create glare that makes it hard to use the monitor.
That’s why we recommend your monitor reflect no more than 6% of the total light shining on it. This keeps glare in check, prevents image quality from being ruined, and allows you to actually see what you’re working on when using your monitor. Lower is always better, but 5% is enough to work without issue.
Reflections % (lower is better)
Best Monitor for Eye Strain: Mistakes To Avoid
- Ignoring Flicker-Free Technology: Flickering screens can cause eye strain and headaches. Opt for monitors with flicker-free technology to minimize this issue.
- Choosing the Wrong Screen Size and Resolution: A monitor that’s too small or with a low resolution can cause you to squint and strain your eyes. On the other hand, a screen that’s too large or with a high resolution might force you to strain to see smaller text. Find a balance that suits your needs. If you are an aspiring competitive gamer, consider what size monitor pro gamers use for optimal field of view and responsiveness. For superior image quality and detailed graphics, the best 4K monitor provides a high resolution that enhances work and play.
- Overlooking Adjustable Brightness and Contrast: A monitor with adjustable brightness and contrast allows you to customize the display to your comfort level and the surrounding lighting conditions. To further reduce eye strain and enhance viewing comfort, employing the best monitor settings for your eyes is crucial.
- Ignoring Ergonomic Features: Consider monitors that offer ergonomic features such as height adjustment, tilt, and swivel options. Proper ergonomics can reduce neck and eye strain by allowing you to position the monitor at a comfortable viewing angle. The best computer monitors for work include ergonomic adjustments and offer optimal screen size and resolution to enhance productivity and minimize fatigue.
The Best Monitor for Eye Strain Tests Compared
Product |
True Score
|
Brightness
|
Contrast Ratio
|
Color Gamut (DCI P3)
|
Color Gamut (sRGB)
|
Input Lag (ms)
|
Response Time (ms)
|
Reflections % | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 87 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|  $809.00 $899 $90 |
| 85 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| $242.00 |
| 85 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| $239.99 $280 $40 |
| 83 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| $899.99 $1,000 $100 |
| 83 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|  $299.99 $400 $100 |
| 83 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| $232.79 $300 $67 |
