We Ranked The 5 Best 144Hz Monitors

Evan Shephard Avatar

Reviewed By

Evan Shephard

(ISF Certified)

True Score Methodology



Reviews Analyzed

Updated May 4, 2024 2:19 PM


best 144hz monitor guide that shows the top best gaming monitor model

A whopping 75% of electronic and appliance reviews are untrustworthy. That’s why every reviewer gets a Trust Rating so our True Score System filters out the fake reviews. See how we do it.

When you’re looking for the best 144Hz monitors, it’s all about getting the smoothest and most responsive gaming experience. A 144Hz refresh rate significantly reduces motion blur and enhances the fluidity of fast-paced games. Top features to consider include low input lag (ideally under 15ms), high brightness levels, wide color gamut coverage, and robust contrast ratios above 1300:1. These aspects collectively ensure vibrant, detailed visuals and seamless gameplay, making your gaming sessions more immersive and enjoyable.

We reviewed 196 monitors, certified 5 as the best, and analyzed 320,848 reviews to curate our list. A staggering 71% of the experts we checked produced untrustworthy reviews. Our unique approach uses True Score and Trust Score to filter out fake and low quality reviews and certify products as tested. The winning monitors performed exceptionally well in our rigorous testing, offering you the best in image quality, responsiveness, and overall gaming performance.


For gamers seeking even faster refresh rates, we’ve also have highly-rated 240Hz gaming monitors, which offer exceptional smoothness for fast-paced games. Additionally, check out our selections of the top computer monitors for an impressive balance of performance, design, and features.

How Did We Rank the 144Hz Gaming Monitors?

We’ve reviewed over 200 websites to compile our guide to the best 144Hz monitors. Our thorough examination included testing methodologies, expert opinions, and customer feedback, allowing us to pinpoint 2 required test results, 2 nice-to-have test results, and 1 must-have specifications. This detailed analysis ensures our recommendations are based on extensive research and real-world application.

Our commitment to unbiased reviews is powered by our ‘True Score’ system, targeting low quality and fake reviews. When you shop through our links, you’re backing our mission. Dive deeper to see how.

?️ Minimum Specifications

  • Must have a refresh rate of 144Hz or higher
  • Must have support for AMD FreeSync or NVIDIA G-Sync

? Test Criteria

  • Input Lag: An input lag of less than 15 milliseconds ensures a highly responsive gaming experience with minimal delay between action and on-screen response.
  • Contrast Ratio: 1300:1 or higher (infinite), offering deep blacks and bright whites for an exceptional viewing experience.

? “Nice To Haves”

  • Fast Response Time: 13ms or less, ensuring smooth transitions without motion blur.
  • Color Accuracy: At least 85% of the sRGB Coverage xy color gamut, providing rich and vibrant colors.

Latest Updates

  • 05/04/2024: Republished the list to include the best 144Hz gaming monitors based on our True Score system.

Top 144Hz Gaming Monitors For 2024

Prices accurate at the time of publishing

See how we test the testers

  • Runner Up

    Best Value

    Best Budget

    gr recommended award

    Best Mid-Range

    Dell S3422DWG

    The Dell S3422DWG excels as a mid-range curved ultrawide 144 Hz monitor with stellar input lag and versatility for gaming and creative tasks.

    Dell S3422DWG Review →

    True Score





    SAVE $51


    Reasons to Buy

    • Outstanding input lag
    • Excellent response time at the maximum refresh rate
    • Large screen with a crisp resolution

    Reasons to Avoid

    • Narrow viewing angles
    • Some black smearing in dark scenes
    • Buggy G-SYNC compatibility at frame rates below 60 fps


    Display TypeVA
    HDMI Inputs2
    HDR FormatYes
    Max Resolution3440 × 1440
    Panel TypePanel TypeVA
    Refresh Rate144 Hz
    Response TimeResponse Time2 ms
    Screen size34"
    Sync TechnologySync TechnologyAMD FreeSync

    All Specs

    Test Results

    Brightness (nits)413
    Contrast Ratio (as ratio x:1)3,008
    Color Gamut/Accuracy % (DCI P3 xy)87
    Color Gamut/Accuracy % (DCI P3 uv)0
    Color Gamut % (sRGB Coverage xy)99
    Color Gamut % (Adobe RGB Coverage xy)83

    All Retailers

    • $349.00
      Save $51


      In Stock

      Free Shipping

    • $396.74
      Save $113


      In Stock

      Free Shipping


    Our Verdict

    For those looking for a mid-range curved ultrawide gaming monitor, the Dell S3422DWG is a solid choice. With an exceptional input lag of just 4.5 ms, best-in-class, and a response time of 6.9 ms, this monitor ensures that every action is as immediate as your reflexes. The importance of these specs cannot be overstated for gamers, as they contribute significantly to a smoother and more responsive gaming experience, especially in fast-paced games where every millisecond counts.

    This monitor’s brightness peak is 413 nits and covers 98.5% of the sRGB color spectrum, making it great for gaming, content consumption, and creation. It has a high contrast ratio of 3008:1, although lower than the 4692:1 of the other curved ultrawide on our list, the Samsung Odyssey Neo G9. This display presents deep blacks and vibrant colors, enhancing the visual fidelity of games and movies alike. The 144 Hz refresh rate and 3440 × 1440 resolution, combined with FreeSync compatibility, provide a fluid and tear-free gaming experience across a wide range of game titles.

    Additionally, the Dell S3422DWG excels in other use cases, such as watching TV shows and movies, and even in productivity and content creation tasks. Its ultrawide aspect ratio and high-resolution offer ample screen real estate, making multitasking more manageable and immersive. The monitor’s performance in brightness, color accuracy, and contrast ratio also means it could provide an enjoyable experience for movie enthusiasts and content creators who prioritize color fidelity and image clarity. Its capabilities extend well into entertainment and productivity, making it a versatile addition to any setup.

  • Runner Up

    Best Value

    Best Budget

    gr recommended award

    Best Mid-Range

    Corsair Xeneon 27QHD240

    • Best For PS4

    The Corsair Xeneon 27QHD240 excels with its OLED panel, rapid response, and wide color gamut, making it an ideal 144 Hz monitor for gamers and creators.

    Corsair Xeneon 27QHD240 Review →

    True Score





    SAVE $200

    Did you know 71% of computer monitor reviewers are untrustworthy?

    Our research found only 33 of 110+ computer monitor reviewers as of June 2024 can be trusted. This is why Gadget Review is committed to calculating the most accurate product scores on the web.

    To do this, we give every computer monitor review site a Trust Rating, which measures how trustworthy the site and their testing claims are. We then leverage AI & a machine learning model to combine and calculate the Trust Rating with data from experts and consumers to deliver the True Score, the web’s most accurate product quality rating.


    Monitor Reviews Analyzed


    Total Products Analyzed

  • Runner Up

    Best Value

    Best Budget

    gr recommended award

    Best Mid-Range

    MSI Optix G27C5

    The MSI Optix G27C5 excels as a versatile, budget-friendly 144 Hz monitor with excellent performance for gamers and creatives alike.

    MSI Optix G27C5 Review →

    True Score





    SAVE $31


    The best monitor for Xbox One X delivers vibrant visuals and low input lag for smooth gaming. For those interested in fast refresh rates, the Alienware AW2721D is a top contender, and the Dell Alienware AW2720HF review highlights its impressive performance in competitive gaming. For work, the best computer monitor for work ensures productivity with accurate colors and high resolution.

    Meanwhile, the leading curved gaming monitor enhances immersion with its panoramic view, while the best 4K gaming monitor provides ultra-sharp visuals for demanding gamers. For those seeking more details, our Gigabyte M32U review showcases its strong 4K performance at an affordable price point.

  • Runner Up

    Best Value

    Best Budget

    gr recommended award

    Best Mid-Range

    Dell G2724D

    The Dell G2724D is a budget-friendly, high-performance 144 Hz monitor with impressive color accuracy and low input lag. It is perfect for gaming and creative tasks.

    Dell G2724D Review →

    True Score





    SAVE $65

    Category Snapshot

    Computer Monitors

    • Total Brands/Products Tested

      27 Brands, 196 Products

    • Top 2 Brands

      Dell, HP

    • Price Range (Budget-Premium)


    • Average True Score


    • Important Test Criteria

      Brightness (cd/m2)
      Contrast Ratio (1000:1)

    • Most Trusted Testers

    • Top Monitor Experts

      Samuel Breton, Chris Eberle

    • Typical Warranty

      2 years

    • Covered by Insurance

      Yes – AKKO

  • Runner Up

    Best Value

    Best Budget

    gr recommended award

    Best Mid-Range

    Samsung Odyssey Neo G9

    The Samsung Odyssey Neo G9 is a high-end curved ultrawide 144 Hz monitor that excels in gaming and versatility, offering top-tier specs and stunning visuals for diverse uses.

    Samsung Odyssey Neo G9 Review →

    True Score





    SAVE $499

Which Criteria Matters for Testing 144Hz Gaming Monitors?

By focusing on these criteria (2 required, 2 nice to have), anyone can quickly and easily compare these computer monitors and how they’ll perform. This helps you make an informed decision and purchase the best 144Hz gaming monitor.

Input Lag< 15 msYesThe time it takes for the monitor to register inputs from the user and process them as action.
Contrast Ratio>1300:1YesThe difference in brightness between the whites (lit sections) and blacks (dim or unlit sections) of a monitor panel.
Color Gamut % (sRGB Coverage xy)> 85%No (Nice to have)How much of the sRGB color gamut is covered by the monitor, which helps indicate color accuracy for web content and games.
Response Time< 13 msNo (Nice to have)The time it takes for a pixel to change from one color to another.

Our Trusted Data Sources

We looked at 110+ computer monitor reviewers and found that 33 are trustworthy (60%+ Trust Rating). The three we have listed below are our most trusted for computer monitors.

  1. Samuel Breton – Rtings, MuckRack
  2. Chris Eberle – Tom’s Hardware, LinkedIn
  3. Tony Hoffman – PC Mag, MuckRack

Interested in a comprehensive analysis of our data sources? We’ve got you covered. Below, you’ll find a detailed list of every computer monitor review website we’ve identified, organized by their respective Trust Ratings from highest to lowest. But we didn’t stop there. We’ve meticulously reviewed each publication and verified the data by checking whether the authors have bio links to MuckRack or LinkedIn. We’re committed to not only checking the facts but ensuring their veracity.

Computer Monitor Test Data & Results

1. Input Lag (ms) Test Results

Input lag is more of a concern when it comes to gaming, but if you plan on using a monitor for a bit of gaming when you aren’t focused on productivity, editing or other tasks, lower values help improve responsiveness. High input lag means your actions take longer to register on the monitor, effectively introducing an artificial delay to your reactions.

It’s for this reason that we generally recommend an input lag under 15 ms. This ensures the delay that’s introduced has minimal impact on your reactions to what’s happening on screen. It’s important to note that a high input lag won’t have any real effect on anything that isn’t gaming, so it can be safely ignored if you don’t plan on gaming on your monitor.

Input Lag (in ms; lower is better)

2. Contrast Ratio (as ratio, x:1) Test Results

Contrast ratio is responsible for making images appear “dynamic” and “dramatic.” By having a good contrast ratio, a monitor is able to recreate dramatic differences between light and dark spots in scenes, images and games accurately.

At a minimum, we recommend a contrast ratio of 1300:1, as this will do a good enough job at allow for detail in dark scenes and images. If contrast ratio gets too low, the picture quality suffers, and the monitor performs worse across the board, no matter the lighting condition. By getting a monitor with a sufficiently high contrast ratio, you can ensure the picture quality doesn’t suffer, and dramatic scenes with stark shifts in lighting, whether they be in games or videos, are created as accurately as possible.

Contrast Ratio (higher is better)

3. Color Gamut % (sRGB Coverage xY) Test Results

Since color gamut comes in a variety of different types, there’s bound to be some confusion as to which is meant for what. sRGB is an extremely common gamut that is used for the vast majority of web content, including how YouTube videos display, and is the primary gamut used for video games.

If you’re looking for accurate colors while web browsing, watching videos or playing games, you’re going to want a coverage of at least 85%. Higher is always better and hitting 100% means that if you correctly calibrate your monitor, you should be seeing content exactly as it was intended. Higher than 100% means that more than just the standard gamut has been covered, which can create more saturated and vivid colors. Coming in under 100% means the colors are less accurate, though this doesn’t become a major issue until you start to fall under 90%.

Color Gamut SRGB (in %; higher is better)

4. Response Time (ms) Test Results

Response time measures how long it takes pixels to change from one color to another, often gray to gray. Low response times means the monitor is able to keep up with constant shifts in colors, and helps prevent motion blur from being introduced whatever you’re watching.

We generally recommend a response time that is 13 ms or less, as this will keep motion blur to a minimum, but if you don’t watch a lot of very high intensity videos or play fast-paced games, response time isn’t going to matter much. It’s important to note that monitors will often advertise a 1ms or 2ms or 5ms response time, to name a few, but response time tests measure full color to color shifts, as well as overshoots, which produces different times than what the monitor often claims on the box. This is why response time is a listed spec, but also a testable criterion.

Response Time (in ms; lower is better)

144Hz Gaming Monitors: Mistakes To Avoid

  1. Ignoring Panel Type: Different panel types, such as TN, IPS, and VA, have their own advantages and disadvantages. TN panels often have faster response times but poorer color reproduction and viewing angles compared to IPS and VA panels. Consider your priorities and choose accordingly. The best monitor for video editing will likely feature an IPS panel as they excel in color accuracy and have wide viewing angles.

  2. Not Checking Compatibility: Ensure that your graphics card can support 144Hz output. Additionally, check if the monitor supports the necessary interfaces like DisplayPort or HDMI 1.4/2.0 for high refresh rates.

  3. Ignoring Adaptive Sync: Adaptive Sync technologies like AMD FreeSync and NVIDIA G-Sync can significantly improve gaming experiences by reducing screen tearing and stuttering. Ensure your monitor supports the adaptive sync technology compatible with your graphics card. To achieve a smooth gaming experience on a budget, the best 1080p gaming monitors offer both Adaptive Sync support and high refresh rates. For gamers looking to balance refresh rate and visual quality, the top 120Hz gaming monitors offer smoother gameplay compared to standard 60Hz screens while benefiting from Adaptive Sync technologies.

  4. Forgetting About Connectivity Options: Ensure the monitor has the necessary ports and cables for your setup. DisplayPort is preferable for high refresh rates, but HDMI 2.0 can also support 144Hz at lower resolutions.

The 144Hz Gaming Monitors Tests Compared

True Score
Contrast Ratio
Color Gamut (DCI P3)
Color Gamut (sRGB)
Input Lag (ms)
Response Time (ms)
Reflections %

Dell S3422DWG

  • Best for 120Hz

  • 413 nits

  • 3,007.5:1

  • 87%

  • 98.5:1

  • 4.5 ms

  • 6.9 ms

  • 5.1%

  • 317.53 nits

  • 317.53:1

  • 96.12%

  • 106.96:1

  • 13.55 ms

  • 0.79 ms

  • 1.8%


MSI Optix G27C5

  • Best for 1080p

  • 287 nits

  • 287:1

  • 0

  • 97.2:1

  • 9.3 ms

  • 6.6 ms

  • 5.4%


Dell G2724D

  • Best for 144Hz

  • 432 nits

  • 432:1

  • 86.35%

  • 100:1

  • 9 ms

  • 4.3 ms

  • 4.8%

  • 628.33 nits

  • 628.33:1

  • 91%

  • 99.6:1

  • 8.9 ms

  • 2.7 ms

  • 5.4%


Learn More About Computer Monitors

Computer Monitors Reviews