HomeBest Computer Best Computer Accessories Best Router TP-Link Archer C9 Router Review

TP-Link Archer C9 Router Review

Written By:

Updated January 25, 2022
Reader Rating2 Votes
4.3
Expert Rating

Everything about what you see on the surface of the TP-Link Archer C9 wireless router would make you think it’s just another a mid-tier, run-of-the-mill consumer router that gets the job done and not much else; but oh how wrong you’d be. This might be a good time to read our best mesh routers list, or check out our review of the best router.

Keep reading my TP-Link Archer C9 review to find out what makes this router one of the best values on shelves today. If you’re with AT&T as your provider, you should also read our review of how customers of AT&T put at risk by new hack.

Overview

Summary: The Archer C9 doesn’t look like much, but performed way outside its paygrade on every test we threw its way.

Price: $119.95 on Amazon
Available: Now
Model: Archer C9

What We Liked

  • Hands down the best speed-to-price ratio we’ve seen yet
  • Software and iOS app were simple to navigate, rich in content
  • Seriously, these speeds are out of control

What We Didn’t

  • Standing design is more obnoxious than cool

TP-Link Archer C9 AC1900 Specs

WiFi Type 802.11ac
Processor 1.0GHz dual-core processor
Operation Modes Wireless Router, Access Point, Bridge
128-bit Wireless Encryption green-check-mark
2.4Ghz green-check-mark
5Ghz green-check-mark
MU-MIMO red-x-icon
QoS green-check-mark
USB Inputs 1 USB 3.0, 1 USB 2.0
Ports 4 10/100/1000Mbps LAN Ports,
1 10/100/1000Mbps WAN Port
Price $119.95
Buy Now

Design

If there were a word to describe the C9’s design: “routery” would probably be it. It’s the essence of what you think about when someone says the word router, with a flate-white shell contrasted against blue LED indicators, three standard antenna lining the top, and all the expected ports on the back.

Related: Also check out our TP Link Archer A7 review.

The C9 does find a way to “stand” out however, thanks to its included vertically-aligned kickstand. Unlike every other router we’ve reviewed, the C9 actually sits on its hind legs, tilting upwards at about a 75-degree angle so all the transmission and status lights can be seen from halfway across the room.

TP-Link C9 Design
Without the option to lay it horizontal, the C9 demands the attention of everyone in the room – whether you want it to or not.

The design choice doesn’t pay off, however. Because of the router’s vertical orientation, in total darkness the bright blue LEDs point outward into your living room instead of straight up to the ceiling. This means they’re pretty much the only thing you can see when you dim the lights to watch a movie or play games, and the constant blinking quickly wore out its welcome to the point were we had to cover up the lights with a piece of white electrical tape just to give our eyes some rest.

Related: If you like this router, you might be interested in our TP Link AX6000 review.

Technically the C9 can be laid on its back, but then you’re barely left with enough space to plug an Ethernet cord in the back of the unit. It’s clear that the engineers at TP-Link wanted to do something different with the design of the C9, but in almost all actual-use cases the gamble just doesn’t pay off.

Software

Unlike Netgear or Linksys, TP-Link doesn’t have any special name for its router configuration dashboard – but that doesn’t make it any less special.

The key features of any respectable configuration dashboard are simplicity, tweakability, and how well the interface is laid out. The TP-Link C9 hits a checkmark on each one of those boxes, but doesn’t make a scene about it either.

The software strikes a solid middle-ground between amateur and expert settings.
The software strikes a solid middle-ground between amateur and expert settings.

On the surface the software is unassuming, and uncomplicated. Wireless settings, network mapping features, and parental controls are easy to find, easy to manage, and perfect for any level technology user in the house to catch on quick. The advanced settings were also plentiful however, allowing us to dive into more nerdy features like QOS management, setting up a media server, and configuring access ports for our wireless printer.

Read: Best Wireless Routers 2019

The TP-Link “Tether” app was also a welcome change with a clean, easy-to-understand interface and deep customization options if you’re logging in from the road. It’s not so intuitive that you would use it over a laptop or desktop from home, but still great if you’re on vacation but need to keep an eye on the parental controls while you’re gone.

Speed & Distance Tests

The TP-Link Archer C9 is $119.95. This is a price point where expectations aren’t high, and a router’s performance doesn’t necessarily have to be the absolute best of the best (given how much you spent on it). You plug it in and think “should be good for streaming and gaming, and that’s enough for me”, without expecting it to blow the doors off your devices anytime soon.

2.4GHz at 5 feet
2.4GHz at 5 feet

All this in mind, you can imagine our surprise when the speeds posted below started rolling in.

On the 2.4GHz network at a distance of 5ft, we were able to max out what the frequency can transmit (and then some): with 64.97Mbs download, and 96.35Mbps upload. The reliability of the 2.4GHz was a bit shoddier at 30ft, but only for uploads. Once we moved outside we actually noticed a gain in download speed at 67.18Mbps, but the upload dropped by nearly 2/3’s, to just 34.26Mbps up.

2.4GHz at 30ft
2.4GHz at 30ft test
5GHz results were a whole other story entirely. When tested from a distance of 5ft, the Archer C9 shattered every record we have on the books at a blistering 289.97Mbps download, 483.37Mbps upload.

Somehow the 5GHz network downloaded faster than the wired connection, blowing away our expectations and the competition’s chances all in the same breath.

5.0GHz at 5 feet
5.0GHz at 5 feet speed test

At a distance of 30ft the same reliability issues that plagued the 2.4GHz tests reappeared, but the dropoff wasn’t as immediately noticeable. At 30ft, the C9 posted a download rate of 181.40Mbps download/132.40Mbps upload.

5.0GHz at 30ft

Switching over to the 5GHz spectrum bumped this figure up considerably. Again at a distance of 5ft, our Nighthawk X6 review showed an average download speed of nearly 210Mbps, with an upload speed of 280Mbps. At a distance of 30ft this number dropped off a bit to 170Mbps down/169Mbps up, but that’s to be expected on the 5Ghz spectrum, which can suffer more significant signal loss when transmitting through walls or doors.

The C9 even trounced its closest competition, the Netgear Nighthax X6, on the wired performance front.

C9 Wired Speed Test
The wired speed test with the Archer C9

When plugged directly into the source, the C9 pumped out a staggering 556.59Mbps download/416.66Mbps. Just as it was with the X6, this is still a long ways off from the 990Mbs down/897Mbps we get when piped directly into our fiber modem, but the router still shines bright under the fact that it’s still significantly cheaper and faster than the competition without breaking a sweat.

All number in Mbps 2.4GHz (5ft) 2.4GHz(30ft) 5GHz (5ft) 5GHz (30ft)

Linksys EA8300
Up: 31.75
Down: 150.97
Up: 76.39
Down: 163.82
Up: 281.26
Down: 502.53
Up: 118.50
Down: 261.30
Up: 99.46
Down: 69.68
Up: 5.45
Down: 9.96
Up: 149.83
Down: 199.93
Up: 9.07
Down: 12.95
61pduaxrczl-_sl1350_
Netgear Nighthawk X10
Up: 109.24
Down: 77.45
Up: 69.30 Down: 69.67 Up: 388.04
Down: 513.45
Up: 351.29
Down: 354.44
linksys-wrt3200acm-design
Linksys WRT3200ACM
Up: 102.65
Down: 73.26
Up: 48.68
Down: 43.52
Up: 475.24
Down: 449.84
Up: 311.96
Down: 276.98
Product Image 1 (1)
AmpliFI HD Mesh Router
Up: 177.99
Down: 196.22
Up: 197.23
Down: 146.29
Up: 368.04
Down: 534.86
Up: 161.06
Down: 372.34
A1+ih84z5YL._SL1500_
TP-LINK Archer C5400
Up: 103.86
Down: 108.11
Up: 61.92
Down: 84.31
Up: 369.84
Down: 459.58
Up: 231.07
Down: 269.54
61qU72ikisL._SL1000_
Linksys EA9500 AC5400
Up: 106.49
Down: 94.73
Up: 69.86
Down: 70.84
Up: 295.30
Down: 302.3
Up: 204.35
Down: 214.64
51wKSYRGfAL._SL1000_
D-Link DIR-879 AC1900 EXO
Up: 102.05
Down: 81.34
Up: 65.28
Down: 64.75
Up: 241.46
Down: 338.53
Up: 209.32
Down: 177.06
Netgear Nighthawk X4S
Netgear Nighthawk X4S
Up: 77.45
Down: 109.24
Up: 59.33
Down: 78.36
Up: 241.70
Down: 348.86
Up: 223.42
Down: 169.15
Netgear-R8500-Router
Netgear Nighthawk X8 AC5300
Up: 91.32
Down: 104.97
Up: 71.61
Down: 82.20
Up: 288.97
Down: 348.33
Up: 216.49
Down: 200.58
Tp Link 9
TP-Link Archer C9 AC1900
Up: 64.94
Down: 96.35
Up: 67.18
Down: 34.26
Up: 289.97
Down: 483.37
Up: 181.40
Down: 132.40
Netgear NightHawk X6 AC3200
Netgear NightHawk X6 AC3200
Up: 59.19
Down: 84.98
N/A Up: 209.80
Down: 280.61
Up: 170.98
Down: 169.84
Linksys EA7500
Linksys EA7500 AC1900
N/A Up: 44.27
Down: 141.55
N/A Up: 78.72
Down: 209.31
Print
TP-Link P5 AC1900
Up: 90.89
Down: 99.21
Up: 40.77
Down: 82.267
Up: 354.28
Down: 524.54
Up: 247.32
Down: 269.95
Linksys WRT1900ACS
Linksys WRT1900ACS
Up: 63.38
Down: 70.02
Up: 59.37
Down: 56.66
Up: 299.83
Down: 412.59
Up: 242.43
Down: 216.16
D-Link DIR890L:R AC3200
D-Link DIR890L/R AC3200
Up: 49.25
Down: 66.30
Up: 33.89
Down: 36.03
Up: 285.83
Down: 470.85
Up: 200.06
Down: 325.12

Wrap Up

The TP-Link Archer C9 router may look a little out of place when it’s shining its status light right in your face from a standing position, but that’s real easy to forget about once you see how this little box screams.

We’ve tested a lot of wireless routers here at Gadget Review. Some of the highest-end routers on shelves today have rolled through these doors, and almost all were able to post results that pushed our diagnostic laptop to its limits. The difference with the C9 is that none of those routers ever dipped below the $200 mark, let alone a measly $119.95.

The vertical design could use a re-work and there’s nothing eye-popping about the software.  But for the amount you pay and the performance you get, the Archer C9 is unequivically the best router for your buck in 2016.

Related Articles:

Bottom Line
Performance
Design
Value
Reader Rating2 Votes
What We Liked
What We Didn’t
4.3
Expert Rating