1440p displays offer some great benefits. With a higher pixel density, they strike an excellent balance between gaming/movies and office performance when image quality is paramount to you. Our selection of the six best 1440p monitors is curated from over 196 models. We have evaluated 321,962 reviews and certified those that performed superbly in testing.
Our approach combines our data-powered True Score system and certified testing to filter fake and low-quality reviews. The winning computer monitors excelled in image quality, refresh rates, and usability features.
How Did We Rank the Best 1440p Monitors?
We take pride in our rigorous evaluation process at Gadget Review. By analyzing over 200 sites, we gathered a wealth of data on the best 1440p monitors. Our expert team dissected testing methods, examined customer reviews, and identified the most crucial criteria. This thorough analysis allowed us to determine the 2 required test results and 1 must-have specification, forming the basis of our true score.
Our commitment to unbiased reviews is powered by our ‘True Score’ system, targeting low quality and fake reviews. When you shop through our links, you’re backing our mission. Dive deeper to see how.
?️ Minimum Specifications
- Must have a max resolution greater than 2560×1440
? Test Criteria
- Contrast Ratio: 2000:1 or higher (infinite), offering deep blacks and bright whites for an exceptional viewing experience.
- Color Accuracy: At least 85% of the sRGB color gamut, providing rich and vibrant colors.
Latest Updates
- 04/26/2024: Completely and thoroughly overhauled the guide to include the best and latest 1440p monitors.
Top 1440p Monitors For 2024
Prices accurate at the time of publishing
Best Overall
Runner Up
Best Value
Best Budget
Best Mid-Range
Premium Pick
Dell S3222DGM
The Dell S3222DGM is an excellent choice for those needing a budget-friendly 1440p monitor without compromising performance. Its high brightness, outstanding contrast, and color accuracy make it perfect for productivity and casual gaming.
True Score
85833Experts
935kCustomers
Absolutely Fresh
SAVE $80$329.99$249.99Read More
Snapshot
Reasons to Buy
- Exceptional contrast levels
- Good color accuracy
- Fast refresh rate
- Good reflection handling
- Decent peak brightness levels
Reasons to Avoid
- Poor viewing angles
- Limited ergonomics
- No support for HDR content
Specifications
Display Type VA HDMI Inputs 2 HDR Format n/a Max Resolution 2560 x 1440 
Panel Type VA Refresh Rate 165 Hz 
Response Time 2 ms Screen size 32″ 
Sync Technology AMD FreeSync All Specs
Test Results
Brightness (nits) 337 Contrast Ratio (as ratio x:1) 4,283 Color Gamut/Accuracy % (DCI P3 xy) 85 Color Gamut/Accuracy % (DCI P3 uv) 0 Color Gamut % (sRGB Coverage xy) 98 Color Gamut % (Adobe RGB Coverage xy) 82 Color Gamut % (Rec. 2020 Coverage xy) 0 Color Gamut % (Rec. 709 Coverage xy) 0 Input Lag (ms) 18 Response Time (ms) 5 Horizontal Viewing Angle (Washout Left) 27 Horizontal Viewing Angle (Washout Right) 28 Vertical Viewing Angle (Washout Above) 27 Vertical Viewing Angle (Washout Below) 26 Reflections % (Total Reflections) 5 All Retailers
$249.99$330Save $80
$279.99$298Save $18
$319.99$430Save $110
Our Verdict
The Dell S3222DGM offers solid performance and 1440p resolution at an extremely affordable price. At 337.14 nits, it’s bright enough for most office environments without losing clarity and fidelity from ambient light.
The monitor also boasts an excellent contrast ratio of 4282.5:1, promising deep blacks and vivid colors, but the lack of HDR support limits you to more standard web content. On the plus side, the Dell S3222DGM shines in the realm of color accuracy, with an sRGB Color Gamut coverage of 98.10% and a DCI P3 xy Color Gamut coverage of 85%. This is excellent if you’re a graphic designer or photographer looking to do photo editing or web design on your monitor.
The high refresh rate of 165Hz provides smoother visuals that are particularly beneficial for gaming. However, while its response time of 5ms is fantastic, the input lag of 18.25ms won’t satisfy your competitive gaming needs, and you’ll need something more responsive.
The Dell S3222DGM is a reliable choice if you’re looking for a cost-effective 1440p monitor without compromising quality. It may not be a great option for HDR content, but it offers outstanding value and excellent performance, making it an extremely flexible monitor that can reliably handle web design, spreadsheeting, and general productivity.
Read Less
Best Overall
Runner Up
Best Value
Best Budget
Best Mid-Range
Premium Pick
Dell S3422DWG
The Dell S3422DWG combines ultrawide convenience with excellent performance for work and play. Its impressive input lag and color accuracy make it ideal for an immersive experience without sacrificing productivity or gaming prowess.
True Score
83824Experts
906kCustomers
Absolutely Fresh
SAVE $51$399.99$349.00Read More
Snapshot
Reasons to Buy
- Outstanding input lag
- Excellent response time at the maximum refresh rate
- Large screen with a crisp resolution
Reasons to Avoid
- Narrow viewing angles
- Some black smearing in dark scenes
- Buggy G-SYNC compatibility at frame rates below 60 fps
Specifications
Display Type VA HDMI Inputs 2 HDR Format Yes Max Resolution 3440 × 1440 Panel Type VA Refresh Rate 144 Hz Response Time 2 ms Screen size 34″ Sync Technology AMD FreeSync All Specs
Test Results
Brightness (nits) 413 Contrast Ratio (as ratio x:1) 3,008 Color Gamut/Accuracy % (DCI P3 xy) 87 Color Gamut/Accuracy % (DCI P3 uv) 0 Color Gamut % (sRGB Coverage xy) 99 Color Gamut % (Adobe RGB Coverage xy) 83 Color Gamut % (Rec. 2020 Coverage xy) 64 Color Gamut % (Rec. 709 Coverage xy) 0 Input Lag (ms) 5 Response Time (ms) 7 Horizontal Viewing Angle (Washout Left) 35 Horizontal Viewing Angle (Washout Right) 36 Vertical Viewing Angle (Washout Above) 33 Vertical Viewing Angle (Washout Below) 31 Reflections % (Total Reflections) 5 All Retailers
- $349.00$400Save $51
- $396.74$510Save $113
Our Verdict
If you’re looking for an ultrawide 1440p monitor that offers great performance for the money, the Dell S3422DWG is an excellent productivity monitor. It features a blue light filter and flicker-free tech to keep your eyes from getting strained when using the monitor. The excellent brightness of 413 nits means that images are always vibrant, even in brightly lit offices.
The monitor also features best-in-class input lag, coming in at just 4.5ms, and an excellent response time of 6.9 ms, making the S34 a great pick for ultrawide gaming if you’re looking for a flexible monitor that can handle both work and play. If the monitor isn’t bright enough, the HP Omen 27C boasts a higher brightness of 446 nits for slightly less money but is less responsive overall.
The S34 features an impressive contrast ratio of 3007.5:1, giving you deep blacks and bright highlights. Moreover, it covers 98.5% of the sRGB color gamut, providing excellent color accuracy for a more vibrant display, especially when looking at web content or doing graphic design.
The Dell S3422DWG offers great image quality, responsiveness, and value. Its mid-range price is more than justified by its excellent brightness, low input lag, and strong color gamut. It is well suited to productivity tasks that demand color accuracy and gaming.
Read Less
Best Overall
Runner Up
Best Value
Best Budget
Best Mid-Range
Premium Pick
Corsair Xeneon 27QHD240
Offering unparalleled responsiveness and color depth, the Corsair Xeneon 27QHD240 is an excellent gaming monitor for creative professionals. Its OLED technology provides stunning visuals, though its higher price reflects its advanced features and performance.
True Score
838310Experts
88334Customers
Absolutely Fresh
SAVE $400$999.99$599.99Read More
Snapshot
Reasons to Buy
- Excellent OLED Picture Quality
- Ultra-Fast Response Time
- Low Input Lag
- High Refresh Rate and VRR Support
Reasons to Avoid
- Lower Peak Brightness Levels
- Higher Input Lag with Different Refresh Rates
- Potential OLED Burn-In
Specifications
Available Inputs 3.5mm, DisplayPort, HDMI, USB 
Bluelight Filter Yes 
Built-In Speakers No 
Built-In Webcam No 
Curved Screen No Display Type OLED 
Flicker Free Yes HDMI Inputs 2 HDR Format HDR10 High Dynamic Range (HDR) Yes Max Resolution 2560 x 1440 Panel Type OLED Refresh Rate 240 Hz Response Time 0.03 ms 
Rotating Screen Yes Screen size 27″ Sync Technology AMD FreeSync, G-Sync All Specs
Test Results
Brightness (nits) 318 Contrast Ratio (as ratio, x:1) 9,473 Color Gamut/Accuracy % (DCI P3 xy) 96 Color Gamut/Accuracy % (DCI P3 uv) 0 Color Gamut % (Adobe RGB Coverage xy) 90 Color Gamut % (sRGB Coverage xy) 107 Color Gamut % (Rec. 2020 Coverage xy) 70 Color Gamut % (Rec. 709 Coverage xy) 0 Input Lag (ms) 14 Response Time (ms) 1 Reflections % (Total Reflections) 2 Horizontal Viewing Angle (Washout Left) 70 Horizontal Viewing Angle (Washout Right) 70 Vertical Viewing Angle (Washout Above) 70 Vertical Viewing Angle (Washout Below) 70 All Retailers
- $599.99$1,000Save $400
- $599.99$1,000Save $400
- $599.99
Our Verdict
If crisp, blur-free content matters most, you should get the Corsair Xeneon 27QHD240. Its best-in-class response time of 0.79ms and outstanding 240 Hz refresh rate makes the monitor unbelievably responsive and capable of handling the most intense, fast-paced media.
This responsiveness pairs very well with the monitor’s input lag of 13.55 ms, making the Xeneon an outstanding gaming monitor that can handle even competitive gaming without breaking a sweat.
Its OLED panel provides an incredible contrast ratio of 9473:1, ensuring exceptional image depth and realism. Furthermore, its color gamut coverage of 106.96% sRGB ensures vibrant and accurate colors, making it an excellent choice for creative professionals in web and graphic design.
However, if you’re concerned about brightness, the HP OMEN 27C is a better choice. It can’t match the Xeneon in contrast or response time, but sometimes brightness is all you need. Still, the 317.53 nits of brightness are plenty for your average office, and the low reflectivity of 1.8% means any ambient light won’t create awful glare.
Whether you’re a competitive gamer or a creative professional, the Corsair Xeneon 27QHD240’s high performance and user-friendly features offer impressive value. These include a rotating screen, a blue light filter, and flicker-free technology. You’ll enjoy a superior visual experience and enhanced comfort during extended use, but it does come with a bigger price tag than non-OLED monitors.
Read Less
Best Overall
Runner Up
Best Value
Best Budget
Best Mid-Range
Premium Pick
Dell S2722DGM
The Dell S2722DGM offers great value for a 1440p monitor, balancing performance and affordability. With solid brightness, contrast, and color accuracy, it’s a commendable option for those seeking a versatile monitor for productivity, web design, and casual gaming at a competitive price.
True Score
82813Experts
905kCustomers
Absolutely Fresh
SAVE $100$299.99$199.99Read More
Snapshot
Reasons to Buy
- High refresh rate
- Rapid response time
- Excellent contrast ratio
- Impressive peak brightness
- Decent reflection handling
Reasons to Avoid
- No support for HDR content
- Poor ergonomics
- Narrow viewing angles
Specifications
Display Type LED HDMI Inputs 2 HDR Format n/a Max Resolution 2560 x 1440 Panel Type VA Refresh Rate 165 Hz Response Time 2 ms Screen size 27″ Sync Technology AMD FreeSync, G-Sync All Specs
Test Results
Brightness (nits) 390 Contrast Ratio (as ratio x:1) 2,948 Color Gamut/Accuracy % (DCI P3 xy) 75 Color Gamut/Accuracy % (DCI P3 uv) 0 Color Gamut % (sRGB Coverage xy) 100 Color Gamut % (Adobe RGB Coverage xy) 80 Color Gamut % (Rec. 2020 Coverage xy) 0 Color Gamut % (Rec. 709 Coverage xy) 0 Input Lag (ms) 9 Response Time (ms) 5 Horizontal Viewing Angle (Washout Left) 43 Horizontal Viewing Angle (Washout Right) 47 Vertical Viewing Angle (Washout Above) 32 Vertical Viewing Angle (Washout Below) 31 Reflections % (Total Reflections) 6 All Retailers
- $199.99$300Save $100
- $249.99$289Save $39
Our Verdict
If you’re looking for a 1440p monitor on a budget, the Dell S2722DGM is the S3222DGM’s “little brother”. It offers 1440p resolution at a smaller size and more affordable price. It has a brightness of 390 nits and is brighter than the S27, making it better suited to well-lit offices.
However, it loses in contrast, featuring a contrast ratio of 2948:1. This isn’t bad; it’s quite good, but if you’re looking for richer blacks and brighter highlights, the S3222DGM offers significantly better contrast, but at the cost of some brightness.
The monitor’s sRGB color gamut coverage of 99.60% is fantastic, offering vibrant and accurate colors. This makes it a great monitor for productivity and web design tasks, including web graphics. The input lag of 9.2 ms and response time of 5.2 ms is also great, making the S27 an excellent budget pick if you’re looking for a monitor that can handle gaming as efficiently as it handles productivity.
The presence of a blue light filter and flicker-free tech also make the S27 excellent for the long hours that tasks like spreadsheeting demand. It keeps your eyes from becoming tired while you work. The monitor also features AMD FreeSync and a refresh rate of 165 Hz, providing a tear-free experience when you switch from working on projects to playing games.
While it lacks HDR support and the contrast of its older brother, the S2722DGM is still an outstanding value pick that offers an unbeatable price-to-performance ratio. If you need a multimedia monitor that can dabble in design, productivity applications, and gaming at an incredible price point, you should grab the S2722DGM.
Read Less
Best Overall
Runner Up
Best Value
Best Budget
Best Mid-Range
Premium Pick
Samsung Odyssey Neo G9
The Samsung Odyssey Neo G9 is a premium ultrawide monitor that excels in brightness, contrast, and color accuracy. It is ideal for productivity and high-end gaming and offers a performance and immersive experience that justifies its price tag.
True Score
80814Experts
863kCustomers
Absolutely Fresh
SAVE $900$2,499.99$1,599.99Read More
Snapshot
Reasons to Buy
- Outstanding 240Hz maximum refresh rate
- Advanced Mini LED local dimming
- HDMI 2.1 inputs
- Excellent color gamut
- Outstanding 5120 x 1440 screen resolution
Reasons to Avoid
- Overly aggressive screen curvature
- Narrow viewing angles
- Variable refresh rate (VRR) issues at 60Hz
Specifications
Curved Screen Yes Display Type VA HDMI Inputs 2 HDR Format Yes Max Resolution 5120 x 1440 Panel Type VA Refresh Rate 240 Hz Response Time 1 ms Screen size 49″ Sync Technology AMD FreeSync All Specs
Test Results
Brightness (nits) 628 Contrast Ratio (as ratio, x:1) 4,692 Color Gamut/Accuracy % (DCI P3 xy) 91 Color Gamut/Accuracy % (DCI P3 uv) 0 Color Gamut % (Adobe RGB Coverage xy) 86 Color Gamut % (sRGB Coverage xy) 100 Color Gamut % (Rec. 2020 Coverage xy) 68 Color Gamut % (Rec. 709 Coverage xy) 0 Input Lag (ms) 9 Response Time (ms) 3 Reflections % (Total Reflections) 5 Horizontal Viewing Angle (Washout Left) 34 Horizontal Viewing Angle (Washout Right) 34 Vertical Viewing Angle (Washout Above) 26 Vertical Viewing Angle (Washout Below) 27 All Retailers
- $1,599.99$2,500Save $900
$1,599.99$2,500Save $900- $1,689.99$3,033Save $1,343
- $2,199.99
Our Verdict
If you need the brightest monitor possible to counter direct sunlight, the Samsung Odyssey Neo G9 can handle the brightest offices without issue. With its best-in-class brightness of 628.33 nits, no amount of ambient light short of direct sunlight will degrade its image quality. However, it is extremely expensive, partially because it’s an exceptionally wide monitor. It may be a 1440p monitor, but it’s also 5120 pixels wide.
This exceptional width is fantastic for productivity, allowing you to lay out windows side by side when working in sheets, documents, or doing design work with references. The Odyssey Neo G9 also exhibits an impressive contrast ratio of 4692.33:1 and 99.6% sRGB coverage, giving it vibrant colors and deep blacks, enhancing your visual experience. The DCI P3 xy coverage of 91% further enhances color accuracy, making it a superb choice for video editors who need movie-focused gamuts for color correction and grading. If you’re looking for better color coverage for web content, the Corsair Xeneon 27QHD240 is a better option, though it isn’t an ultrawide display.
The G9 is also extremely responsive, making it a phenomenal choice for gaming. Thanks to its low input lag of 8.9 ms and extremely fast response time of 2.7 ms, motion blur during fast-paced gaming or action scenes is virtually nonexistent and lag-free.
With its high brightness, excellent contrast, and low input lag, the Odyssey Neo G9 offers exceptional performance – if you’re willing to pay a premium. Its impressive specs and performance come at the cost of being the most expensive monitor on our list, but if you’re willing to drop serious cash on an ultrawide monitor with performance to match, it’s worth the price.
Read Less
Best Overall
Runner Up
Best Value
Best Budget
Best Mid-Range
Premium Pick
HP Omen 27C
With its high brightness and strong color accuracy, the HP OMEN 27C is a solid choice for creative work in bright environments. It may not offer the best contrast ratio, but its performance and affordability make it a great option.
True Score
79775Experts
8765Customers
Mixed Reviews
SAVE $163$529.99$367.00Read More
Snapshot
Reasons to Buy
- Excellent 240Hz refresh rate
- Super-low input lag
- Superb 2,402:1 contrast ratio in SDR mode
- Decent response time
- Good native contrast ratio
Reasons to Avoid
- Poor local dimming feature causes some blooming
- Black smearing in dark scenes
- Mediocre black uniformity
- Very aggressive screen curve
- So-so ergonomics
Specifications
Display Type VA HDMI Inputs 1 HDR Format Yes Max Resolution 2560 x 1440 Panel Type VA Refresh Rate 240 Hz Response Time 6 ms Screen size 27″ Sync Technology AMD FreeSync All Specs
Test Results
Brightness (nits) 446 Contrast Ratio (as ratio, x:1) 2,726 Color Gamut/Accuracy % (DCI P3 xy) 82 Color Gamut/Accuracy % (DCI P3 uv) 0 Color Gamut % (Adobe RGB Coverage xy) 76 Color Gamut % (sRGB Coverage xy) 102 Color Gamut % (Rec. 2020 Coverage xy) 66 Color Gamut % (Rec. 709 Coverage xy) 0 Input Lag (ms) 10 Response Time (ms) 9 Reflections % (Total Reflections) 5 Horizontal Viewing Angle (Washout Left) 23 Horizontal Viewing Angle (Washout Right) 23 Vertical Viewing Angle (Washout Above) 22 Vertical Viewing Angle (Washout Below) 22 All Retailers
- $367.00$530Save $163
- $439.99
Our Verdict
If you need a monitor with high brightness but don’t want to pay an incredible premium, the HP OMEN 27C is an excellent pick. With a brightness of 446 nits, it’s great for brightly lit offices where you have to fight strong ambient lights. The 27C also features an excellent color gamut coverage of 102.1% sRGB, making it a fantastic choice for web design, graphic design, general productivity, and multimedia web content.
On the downside, the HP Omen 27C’s contrast ratio of 2725.5:1, while decent, is eclipsed by other picks on our list; if you’re looking to get more contrast at a similar price, Dell’s S3422DWG has richer blacks and better whites, but you’ll be trading away brightness in the process.
Its input lag of 9.9ms is decent for most casual and lightly competitive games, and its response time of 8.9 ms will keep most high-intensity content from blurring and degrading in image quality, but better gaming options exist.
Despite these drawbacks, the HP OMEN 27C is still an excellent pick. Its high brightness and color accuracy highlight its usefulness as a monitor for creative professionals. If you need to edit photos, videos, or graphic designs, you should get the OMEN 27C.
Read Less
Which Criteria Matters for Testing Best 1440p Monitors?
By focusing on these criteria (2 required), anyone can quickly and easily compare these computer monitors and how they’ll perform. This helps you make an informed decision and purchase the best 1440p monitor.
| CRITERIA | RANGE | REQUIRED | DEFINITION |
|---|---|---|---|
| Contrast Ratio | >2000:1 | Yes | The difference in brightness between the whites (lit sections) and blacks (dim or unlit sections) of a monitor panel. |
| Color Gamut % (sRGB Coverage xy) | > 85% | Yes | How much of the sRGB color gamut is covered by the monitor, which helps indicate color accuracy for web content and games. |
Our Trusted Data Sources
We looked at 110+ computer monitor reviewers and found that 33 are trustworthy (60%+ Trust Rating). The three we have listed below are our most trusted for computer monitors.
- Samuel Breton – Rtings, MuckRack
- Chris Eberle – Tom’s Hardware, LinkedIn
- Tony Hoffman – PC Mag, MuckRack
Interested in a comprehensive analysis of our data sources? We’ve got you covered. Below, you’ll find a detailed list of every computer monitor review website we’ve identified, organized by their respective Trust Ratings from highest to lowest. But we didn’t stop there. We’ve meticulously reviewed each publication and verified the data by checking whether the authors have bio links to MuckRack or LinkedIn. We’re committed to not only checking the facts but ensuring their veracity.
Computer Monitor Test Data & Results
1. Contrast Ratio (as ratio, x:1) Test Results
Contrast Ratio
> 2000:1
Acceptable range of performance
Definition: How bright the monitor will get, usually under specific testing conditions, like 10% windows (which means 10% of the screen is a white box.)
Units of Measurement: Ratio
Tools to Measure: Luminance meter or photometer or colorimeter
Why It’s Important:
Contrast ratio is how dynamic images are given detail and dramatic effect, with very dark areas appearing truly dark, while bright areas are bright and pop.
Contrast ratio is responsible for making images appear “dynamic” and “dramatic.” By having a good contrast ratio, a monitor is able to recreate dramatic differences between light and dark spots in scenes, images and games accurately.
At a minimum, we recommend a contrast ratio of 2000:1, as this will do a good enough job at allow for detail in dark scenes and images. If contrast ratio gets too low, the picture quality suffers, and the monitor performs worse across the board, no matter the lighting condition. By getting a monitor with a sufficiently high contrast ratio, you can ensure the picture quality doesn’t suffer, and dramatic scenes with stark shifts in lighting, whether they be in games or videos, are created as accurately as possible.
Contrast Ratio (higher is better)
2. Color Gamut % (sRGB Coverage xY) Test Results
Since color gamut comes in a variety of different types, there’s bound to be some confusion as to which is meant for what. sRGB is an extremely common gamut that is used for the vast majority of web content, including how YouTube videos display, and is the primary gamut used for video games.
If you’re looking for accurate colors while web browsing, watching videos or playing games, you’re going to want a coverage of at least 85%. Higher is always better and hitting 100% means that if you correctly calibrate your monitor, you should be seeing content exactly as it was intended. Higher than 100% means that more than just the standard gamut has been covered, which can create more saturated and vivid colors. Coming in under 100% means the colors are less accurate, though this doesn’t become a major issue until you start to fall under 90%.
Color Gamut % (sRGB Coverage xy)
> 85%
Acceptable range of performance
Definition: The amount of the sRGB gamut that the monitor covers.
Units of Measurement: %
Tools to Measure: Colorimeter
Why It’s Important:
The sRGB color gamut is the most commonly used gamut for most colors when browsing the web, watching videos on the web on sites like YouTube, and when playing video games.
Color Gamut SRGB (in %; higher is better)
Best 1440p Monitors: Mistakes To Avoid
- Ignoring refresh rate and response time: While resolution is important, don’t overlook other critical factors like refresh rate and response time. For gaming or fast-paced tasks, a monitor with a higher refresh rate (e.g., 144Hz monitors or higher) and lower response time (e.g., 1ms) can provide smoother motion and reduce motion blur. If you still want a 1440p monitor, we recommend several top-rated 1440p 144hz monitor models that will be great additions to your setup. There are even 240Hz gaming monitors that offer very smooth motion, though keep in mind that not everybody needs the highest refresh rate. Consider your usage needs before making a decision solely based on resolution.
- Overlooking panel type: Different panel types, such as IPS, TN, and VA, offer varying characteristics in terms of color accuracy, viewing angles, and response times. IPS panels typically provide better color reproduction and wider viewing angles, making them suitable for tasks like content creation and photo editing. TN panels, on the other hand, offer faster response times and are often preferred by gamers for their low input lag. Consider your priorities and usage scenarios when choosing the panel type.
- Not considering connectivity options: Ensure the monitor has the necessary ports to connect to your devices, such as HDMI, DisplayPort, and USB. If you have specific connectivity needs, such as USB-C or multiple inputs, make sure the monitor meets those requirements.
- Neglecting ergonomic features: Ergonomic features like height adjustment, tilt, swivel, and pivot can significantly impact your comfort, especially during extended use. Look for monitors with adjustable stands or VESA mounting compatibility to optimize your viewing experience.
The Best 1440p Monitors Tests Compared
Product |
True Score
|
Brightness
|
Contrast Ratio
|
Color Gamut (DCI P3)
|
Color Gamut (sRGB)
|
Input Lag
|
Response Time (ms)
|
Reflections %
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 85 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|  $249.99 $330 $80 |
| 83 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|  $349.00 $400 $51 |
| 83 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| $599.99 $1,000 $400 |
| 82 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| $199.99 $300 $100 |
| 80 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| $1,599.99 $2,500 $900 |
79 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|  $367.00 $530 $163 |
