Dutch Defense Chief Claims F-35 Can Be “Jailbroken Like an iPhone”

Dutch defense chief suggests F-35 fighters could be modified for independence from US software control systems

Al Landes Avatar
Al Landes Avatar

By

Our editorial process is built on human expertise, ensuring that every article is reliable and trustworthy. AI helps us shape our content to be as accurate and engaging as possible.
Learn more about our commitment to integrity in our Code of Ethics.

Image: Wikimedia

Key Takeaways

Key Takeaways

  • Dutch Defense Chief claims F-35 jets could be “jailbroken like an iPhone”
  • Netherlands faces limited access to F-35’s 8+ million encrypted source code lines
  • Security experts dismiss jailbreaking claims as unrealistic due to technical barriers

Imagine your $80 million fighter jet going dark because of a software update dispute. Dutch Defense Secretary Gijs Tuinman dropped a bombshell during a February 15, 2026 BNR Nieuwsradio interview, claiming F-35 Lightning II jets could be “jailbroken like an iPhone” if the US ever cuts off software support.

The comparison isn’t as wild as it sounds. F-35 fighters depend entirely on US-controlled systems for everything that matters. The ALIS/ODIN network handles software updates, threat libraries, electronic warfare packages, and weapons integration files. Without these Mission Data Files flowing from American servers, even the most advanced stealth fighter becomes an expensive paperweight.

Partnership Tiers Create Digital Divide

Netherlands gets less access than UK partners despite billion-dollar investment

The technical reality gets complicated quickly. The Netherlands bought into the F-35 program as a Level 2 partner, which sounds impressive until you realize what it actually means. Unlike Level 1 partner Britain or special-case Israel with their customized F-35Is, the Dutch get limited access to the jet’s 8+ million lines of encrypted source code.

Tuinman acknowledged this dependency but emphasized the F-35 remains a “shared product.” UK Rolls-Royce engines create mutual vulnerability, he argued, though he refused to elaborate on jailbreaking methods, calling it something he “should never say.”

Experts Call Jailbreaking Claims Unrealistic

Technical hurdles make iPhone comparisons misleading

Security researchers aren’t buying the jailbreak analogy. Unlike your iPhone with its thriving hacker community and public exploits, F-35s only sell to governments through Foreign Military Sales programs. Tom’s Hardware noted that “modifying an F-35 jet outside of official channels is likely easier said than done.”

The risks include:

  • Voided upgrade paths
  • Introduced vulnerabilities
  • Fleet-grounding software errors
  • US detection through anti-tamper systems

No midnight Discord channels are reverse-engineering fighter jet firmware. The technical barriers far exceed anything facing consumer device hackers.

Sovereignty Concerns Echo Broader Tech Tensions

EU pushes for independence beyond just military hardware

Tuinman’s provocative statement reflects growing European anxiety about technological dependence—the same concerns driving EU semiconductor and AI initiatives. The fear isn’t unfounded: software-dependent weapons systems create leverage points that extend far beyond traditional military alliances.

Whether the Dutch could actually jailbreak their F-35s remains questionable. What’s certain is that even raising the possibility signals how military tech dependency increasingly mirrors the consumer device ecosystem—complete with the same control battles, just with higher stakes.

Share this

At Gadget Review, our guides, reviews, and news are driven by thorough human expertise and use our Trust Rating system and the True Score. AI assists in refining our editorial process, ensuring that every article is engaging, clear and succinct. See how we write our content here →