The Trust List: Top 100 Most Trusted Tech Journalists
UPDATED
\T
Our BHAG (Big Hairy Audacious Goal) is to flip the information pyramid for the little guy.
We want our audience to always be on top of the pile of fake reviews online, not on the bottom where predatory behavior can swallow up your time and money.
Rank | Reviewer | Avg. Trust Rating | Classification | # of Categories | Big Media-Owned/Independent | Best For | Best For | Best For |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
101.11% | Highly-Trusted Reviewer | 16 | Independent | |||||
84.82% | Trusted Reviewer | 7 | Independent | |||||
81.59% | Trusted Reviewer | 23 | Independent | |||||
77.01% | Trusted Reviewer | 27 | ||||||
70.27% | Trusted Reviewer | 5 | ||||||
70.02% | Trusted Reviewer | 12 | ||||||
68.26% | Trusted Reviewer | 14 | ||||||
67.82% | Trusted Reviewer | 12 | Independent | |||||
66.78% | Trusted Reviewer | 28 | Independent | |||||
66.45% | Trusted Reviewer | 12 | ||||||
66.21% | Trusted Reviewer | 6 | ||||||
63.56% | Trusted Reviewer | 27 | ||||||
63.42% | Trusted Reviewer | 20 | Independent | |||||
63.32% | Trusted Reviewer | 13 | Independent | |||||
62.94% | Trusted Reviewer | 30 | ||||||
62.12% | Trusted Reviewer | 15 | Independent | |||||
61.61% | Trusted Reviewer | 15 | ||||||
60.78% | Trusted Reviewer | 10 | Independent | |||||
60.16% | Trusted Reviewer | 30 | ||||||
58.97% | Proceed with Caution | 16 | Independent | |||||
58.43% | Proceed with Caution | 7 | Independent | |||||
57.92% | Proceed with Caution | 19 | Independent | |||||
57.88% | Fake Reviewer | 29 | Independent – Has Investors | |||||
57.47% | Proceed with Caution | 16 | ||||||
56.37% | Fake Reviewer | 30 | ||||||
55.46% | Proceed with Caution | 28 | Independent | |||||
55.01% | Proceed with Caution | 8 | Independent | |||||
54.92% | Proceed with Caution | 11 | Independent | |||||
53.87% | Proceed with Caution | 21 | Retail Corporation – Has Investors | |||||
53.72% | Proceed with Caution | 5 | Independent | |||||
53.47% | Proceed with Caution | 10 | Independent | |||||
53.46% | Proceed with Caution | 30 | ||||||
53.43% | Fake Reviewer | 23 | ||||||
53.41% | Proceed with Caution | 5 | Independent | |||||
53.34% | Proceed with Caution | 16 | Independent | |||||
53.27% | Proceed with Caution | 19 | ||||||
53.25% | Proceed with Caution | 13 | Independent | |||||
53.23% | Fake Reviewer | 25 | ||||||
53.08% | Proceed with Caution | 18 | Independent | |||||
53.08% | Proceed with Caution | 20 | Independent | |||||
53.04% | Proceed with Caution | 8 | Independent | |||||
52.73% | Proceed with Caution | 17 | ||||||
51.71% | Fake Reviewer | 26 | ||||||
50.87% | Proceed with Caution | 26 | Independent | |||||
50.68% | Proceed with Caution | 22 | ||||||
50.64% | Proceed with Caution | 15 | Independent | |||||
50.63% | Proceed with Caution | 5 | Independent | |||||
50.25% | Proceed with Caution | 13 | Independent | |||||
49.96% | Not Worth It | 24 | Independent | |||||
48.71% | Not Worth It | 28 |