U.S. Acting Cyber Chief Uploaded Sensitive Files to ChatGPT

Acting CISA director bypassed secure AI tools to upload classified contracting documents to public platform last July

C. da Costa Avatar
C. da Costa Avatar

By

Our editorial process is built on human expertise, ensuring that every article is reliable and trustworthy. AI helps us shape our content to be as accurate and engaging as possible.
Learn more about our commitment to integrity in our Code of Ethics.

Image: Wikipedia

Key Takeaways

Key Takeaways

  • Acting CISA Director uploaded classified government documents to public ChatGPT platform
  • Gottumukkala bypassed secure DHSChat alternatives despite agency-wide ChatGPT restrictions
  • Security warnings triggered federal review involving DHS general counsel and CIOs

Just imagine the acting head of America’s cybersecurity agency requesting special permission to use the one AI tool banned for everyone else. Then imagine him uploading sensitive government documents to it. You don’t need much imagination—this actually happened.

When Cyber Leadership Goes Rogue

Madhu Gottumukkala, acting director of the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency since May 2025, uploaded “for official use only” contracting documents to public ChatGPT last summer. Multiple automated security warnings lit up federal networks like a Christmas tree. The irony writes itself: the person protecting America’s digital infrastructure chose to feed sensitive data to a platform that shares inputs with millions of users for AI training.

While other DHS employees faced ChatGPT blocks, Gottumukkala forced his way to special access. He specifically requested and received permission from CISA’s CIO to use the public version instead of secure alternatives like DHSChat. Think about that for a moment—bypassing purpose-built secure tools to use the consumer version that explicitly harvests your data.

The Security Theater Unfolds

The uploads happened in July 2025, triggering warnings in August that apparently nobody acted on immediately. DHS eventually launched an internal review involving senior officials including acting general counsel Joseph Mazzara and multiple CIOs. According to an anonymous DHS official, Gottumukkala “forced CISA’s hand into making them give him ChatGPT, and then he abused it.”

CISA spokesperson Marci McCarthy now claims the use was “short-term and limited” under proper controls. The timeline disputes and bureaucratic finger-pointing suggest otherwise. Potential consequences range from mandatory retraining to full clearance revocation—outcomes that should terrify anyone concerned about federal cybersecurity leadership.

This incident perfectly captures the disconnect between AI hype and security reality in government. When the person tasked with protecting national infrastructure can’t distinguish between consumer and enterprise AI tools, you’ve got computer problems that run deeper than any single security breach.

Share this

At Gadget Review, our guides, reviews, and news are driven by thorough human expertise and use our Trust Rating system and the True Score. AI assists in refining our editorial process, ensuring that every article is engaging, clear and succinct. See how we write our content here →