The best watches aren’t always flashy. This watch is rather unremarkable looking. That much we didn’t need to tell you.  But the glow you see, that’s powered by nuclear power, which supposedly will last for up to 25 years.  At first blush we though the watch itself was powered by a very small nuclear power plant, but sadly we now believe we are wrong.  Then again, maybe it’s of the wind up ilk, but since the page doesn’t say, we’re left to our own assumptions.

To be candid, only a small portion of the watch glows, but don’t let that deter you.  It also sports a stainless steel all black body that is water resistant to 300 feet and tells the time 24/7!  And if you happen to be concerned with your wrist’s physical health – after all, nuclear power isn’t exactly the safest – this watch has been determined to be 100% safe and complies with the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) regulations.

Order one today for $175 and it will arrive on September 15th.

Christen Costa

Grew up back East, got sick of the cold and headed West. Since I was small I have been pushing buttons - both electronic and human. With an insatiable need for tech I thought "why not start a blog focusing on technology, and use my dislikes and likes to post on gadgets."

Related Articles


  1. What do you mean “nuclear power isn’t exactly the safest”?

    Energy Source Death Rate (deaths per TWh)

    Coal – world average 161 (26% of world energy, 50% of electricity)
    Coal – China 278
    Coal – USA 15
    Oil 36 (36% of world energy)
    Natural Gas 4 (21% of world energy)
    Biofuel/Biomass 12
    Peat 12
    Solar (rooftop) 0.44 (less than 0.1% of world energy)
    Wind 0.15 (less than 1% of world energy)
    Hydro 0.10 (europe death rate, 2.2% of world energy)
    Hydro – world including Banqiao) 1.4 (about 2500 TWh/yr and 171,000 Banqiao dead)
    Nuclear 0.04 (5.9% of world energy)

  2. this is a Tritium H3 watch everyone and his brother puts them out like Smith & Wesson,Traser abd Luminox just to name a few

  3. Yeah, just have to echo what the person below said. This article makes the writer look like either a sensationalist douchebag, or an idiot who assumes everyone else is as ignorant as he.

    1. M, really? That’s a bit harsh, don’t you think? That said, can you justify the “sensationalist douchebag” part, because I’m not sure what you’re getting at? Are you referring to the title?

  4. Tritium illuminated watches have been around for years. If you are this clueless about a product you shouldn’t be wasting peoples time with your reviews.

    1. Well, first off this isn’t a REVIEW. Second, how am I clueless? You’re just pulling the typical comment crap on the net because you’re bored and don’t have anything better to do. So your time by that very account is worth nothing. Troll some where else SHG.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *