Cleveland Flock Surveillance Network Used for Immigration Searches Despite Safeguards

City blames vendor error after Texas and Florida ICE-linked agencies ran 163 searches on Cleveland cameras in January

Al Landes Avatar
Al Landes Avatar

By

Image: John Kuntz – Cleveland

Key Takeaways

Key Takeaways

  • Cleveland discovered 163 immigration searches accessed city cameras despite activated protection filters
  • Texas and Florida agencies with ICE connections searched Cleveland’s network remotely
  • City blames Flock vendor error involving misclassified fire department drones

Audit logs don’t lie, but they sure can embarrass. Cleveland officials spent months assuring residents that their Flock cameras network couldn’t be used for immigration enforcement—right up until records revealed 163 immigration-related searches hitting the city’s system between December 28 and January 27. The searches appeared weeks after Cleveland supposedly activated an “immigration filter” designed to block exactly this type of access.

Out-of-State Agencies Accessed Cleveland Network

Texas and Florida agencies with ICE connections ran searches through Cleveland’s cameras despite local protections.

The problematic queries came primarily from agencies outside Ohio, including the Florida Fish & Wildlife Conservation Commission and Texas Department of Public Safety—both participants in the federal 287(g) program that deputizes local officers for immigration enforcement. Some Florida searches explicitly referenced “I.C.E.” in their descriptions. Meanwhile, Cleveland residents were told immigration searches “couldn’t happen” on their city’s cameras.

City Points Fingers at Vendor Configuration Error

Officials claim fire department drones were mistakenly classified as searchable devices in Flock’s national network.

Cleveland now argues these weren’t actual license plate searches but a Flock configuration mistake that temporarily pulled fire and EMS drones into the national search network. Public Safety spokesperson Jamil Hairston called it “a simple mix-up on behalf of Flock” and insisted “unequivocally” that no resident license plate data was exposed. Notably, Flock Safety hasn’t publicly confirmed this explanation, leaving the city’s technical defense hanging like a software update that never downloads.

Pattern Emerges Across Ohio Cities

Shaker Heights and Dayton documented thousands of immigration searches before policy changes and shutdowns.

Cleveland’s controversy isn’t happening in isolation. Shaker Heights discovered hundreds of immigration-related queries after activists obtained records—turns out the city had never activated its immigration filter. Dayton found approximately 7,100 immigration searches and shut down its entire Flock system indefinitely. The pattern suggests these “safeguards” work about as well as social media privacy settings: theoretically protective, practically porous.

Contract Renewal Faces Council Scrutiny

Activists and some council members question whether technical fixes can address structural surveillance concerns.

Activist Bryn Adams of the “Flock No” coalition expressed skepticism about the city’s drone explanation: “I don’t even know if I follow that explanation, let alone buy it.” With Cleveland’s Flock contract expiring June 28, Mayor Bibb has opted to send renewal to City Council rather than approve it administratively. The decision will test whether elected officials prioritize crime-fighting technology or address growing concerns that vendor-managed filters can’t reliably prevent federal immigration enforcement from accessing your neighborhood’s driving patterns.

Share this

At Gadget Review, our guides, reviews, and news are driven by thorough human expertise and use our Trust Rating system and the True Score. AI assists in refining our editorial process, ensuring that every article is engaging, clear and succinct. See how we write our content here →