Lawsuit Bombshell: WhatsApp’s Encryption Lie – 2B Users’ Private Messages in Meta’s Hands

International lawsuit filed across five countries claims Meta can access WhatsApp messages despite encryption promises

Annemarije de Boer Avatar
Annemarije de Boer Avatar

By

Our editorial process is built on human expertise, ensuring that every article is reliable and trustworthy. AI helps us shape our content to be as accurate and engaging as possible.
Learn more about our commitment to integrity in our Code of Ethics.

Image: Yu. Samoilov – Flickr

Key Takeaways

Key Takeaways

  • Class-action lawsuit alleges Meta misleads 2+ billion WhatsApp users about encryption privacy
  • Whistleblowers claim Meta employees can access messages despite end-to-end encryption promises
  • Meta faces mounting pressure following $5 billion FTC fine and regulatory investigations

Dead phones during emergencies are dangerous, but discovering your “private” messages aren’t actually private? That’s a different kind of crisis entirely. A massive class-action lawsuit filed January 23, 2026, alleges Meta has been misleading WhatsApp’s 2+ billion users about end-to-end encryption, claiming the company can actually access, store, and analyze messages despite those reassuring in-app notices about privacy.

The international lawsuit spans five countries—Australia, Brazil, India, Mexico, and South Africa—seeking to represent users globally. Unnamed whistleblowers allegedly told plaintiffs’ lawyers that Meta’s infrastructure undermines genuine encryption by retaining decryptable data for analysis. If you’ve trusted WhatsApp for sensitive conversations, this case challenges whether that trust was misplaced.

WhatsApp has used the Signal protocol for end-to-end encryption since Meta’s 2014 acquisition, displaying notices that “only people in this chat can read, listen to, or share” messages. The lawsuit calls this false advertising, claiming Meta’s employees can access content despite the encryption theater. Your private family group chats and business discussions might not have been so private after all.

Meta spokesperson Andy Stone fired back hard, calling the allegations “categorically false and absurd” and dismissing the suit as a “frivolous work of fiction.” The company plans to seek sanctions against the plaintiffs’ law firms—Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, Keller Postman LLP, and Barnett Legal—showing how seriously Meta takes this threat to its privacy reputation.

This isn’t Meta’s first privacy rodeo. The company paid a $5 billion FTC fine in 2020 following Cambridge Analytica, and former WhatsApp security head Ataullah Beg recently claimed 1,500 engineers could access user data. With UK regulators also investigating WhatsApp’s data handling, the pressure keeps mounting.

Whether this lawsuit succeeds or fails, it highlights a fundamental question about trusting Big Tech with your most personal communications. Like finding out your diary has been photocopied, the mere possibility that WhatsApp isn’t as secure as promised changes how you might think about what you share.

Share this

At Gadget Review, our guides, reviews, and news are driven by thorough human expertise and use our Trust Rating system and the True Score. AI assists in refining our editorial process, ensuring that every article is engaging, clear and succinct. See how we write our content here →