6 AI Security Strategies That 80% of Companies Don’t Use

Why generic AI fails at security—and how domain-specific models detect the threats others miss.

Annemarije de Boer Avatar
Annemarije de Boer Avatar

By

Our editorial process is built on human expertise, ensuring that every article is reliable and trustworthy. AI helps us shape our content to be as accurate and engaging as possible.
Learn more about our commitment to integrity in our Code of Ethics.

Image: Gadget Review

Key Takeaways

Security teams face a harsh reality: generic AI models fail spectacularly at cybersecurity. While 80% of organizations rely on general-purpose artificial intelligence for threat detection, these tools miss the subtle patterns that separate legitimate traffic from sophisticated attacks. Domain-specific AI-powered models, trained on security logs and threat intelligence, recognize what generic systems dismiss as noise—malicious IP addresses, phishing URLs, and attack signatures that could save your organization from the next headline-worthy breach.

6. Domain-Specific AI Models

Image: Unsplash

Using general-purpose AI for security is like bringing a butter knife to brain surgery—technically a tool, but wildly inappropriate for the job. Security-specific AI models train on threat data: IP addresses, malicious URLs, attack patterns, and the digital fingerprints that generic models ignore. When your security team drowns in 10,000 daily alerts, you need AI that can distinguish between a legitimate software update and a supply chain attack.

Google and Cisco recently launched open-weight, security-specific models that recognize threats with surgical precision. These reasoning models deploy in your own environment, eliminating the “send sensitive data to the cloud” anxiety that keeps CISOs awake at night.

5. Agentic AI

Image: Unsplash

Traditional security operates like a one-person band—chaotic and overwhelmed. Agentic AI creates digital worker bees, each handling specific tasks within a coordinated response. One agent monitors network traffic while another analyzes email patterns, and a third cross-references threat intelligence databases. The orchestrator resolves disagreements through pre-programmed protocols, preventing the AI equivalent of a group project meltdown.

This setup transforms security operations from reactive scrambling into proactive defense. Anyone who’s managed a SOC during a major incident knows the drill: analysts juggling dozens of tools while threats multiply faster than reality TV shows.

4. Open Source AI Models

Image: Unsplash

Adversaries share attack techniques across dark web forums, so why shouldn’t defenders collaborate on solutions? Open-source security AI models create a collective intelligence network where improvements benefit everyone. Cisco’s Foundation-sec and similar Google initiatives prove that sharing defensive knowledge strengthens the entire ecosystem—like neighborhood watch programs, but for the digital realm.

Machine-scale threats demand machine-scale defenses, making open-source collaboration essential rather than optional. These models adapt to new threat patterns without vendor lock-in or licensing headaches that plague enterprise security budgets.

3. Securing AI

Image: Unsplash

Deploying AI without proper guardrails resembles handing Ferrari keys to a teenager—exciting potential, catastrophic risk. Visibility requirements include understanding what models actually do during threat analysis, not just trusting black-box decisions. Validation ensures models behave predictably under attack scenarios, while runtime enforcement prevents AI hallucinations from triggering false positive storms.

Security teams need AI that reduces alert noise, not amplifies it. Proper implementation includes monitoring model behavior, validating outputs against known threat patterns, and maintaining human oversight for critical decisions. Recent vulnerabilities in password managers demonstrate how security tools themselves can become attack vectors.

2. AI Adoption Challenges

Image: Unsplash

Alert fatigue hits security professionals harder than Monday morning coffee withdrawal. Teams manage dozens of security tools while facing an industry-wide talent shortage that leaves analysts overwhelmed and undertrained. Generic AI models worsen this problem by generating more noise than signal, mistaking legitimate business activities for threats.

Domain-specific AI addresses these challenges by automating repetitive analysis tasks and prioritizing genuine threats. The solution requires purpose-built models that understand security context rather than retrofitted general AI that treats security logs like social media posts. Mobile security professionals also benefit from specialized AI apps that help manage threats across all device types.

1. Machine Scale Defenses

Image: Unsplash

Attack volumes grow exponentially while human response times remain frustratingly linear. Security-focused AI processes log analysis, dark web intelligence, and adversary tracking at speeds that make human analysts look like dial-up internet. These systems spot threats, initiate containment, and patch vulnerabilities before morning coffee kicks in.

Organizations facing AI-generated attacks need defense systems operating at matching speeds. Traditional security approaches crumble against adversaries using automated reconnaissance, payload generation, and lateral movement techniques that evolve faster than manual countermeasures.

Share this Article



About Gadget Review’s Editorial Process

At Gadget Review, our guides, reviews, and news are driven by thorough human expertise and use our Trust Rating system and the True Score. AI assists in refining our editorial process, ensuring that every article is engaging, clear and succinct. See how we write our content here →