When AI Bands Fool Half a Million Spotify Listeners

How one fake indie band exposed Spotify’s complete inability to detect AI-generated music and artists.

C. da Costa Avatar
C. da Costa Avatar

By

Our editorial process is built on human expertise, ensuring that every article is reliable and trustworthy. AI helps us shape our content to be as accurate and engaging as possible.
Learn more about our commitment to integrity in our Code of Ethics.

Image Credit: Spotify

Key Takeaways

Key Takeaways

  • AI-generated “indie band” fooled 500,000+ Spotify listeners with fake personas.
  • Multiple hoax layers exposed the platform’s inability to detect synthetic content.
  • Artists are abandoning Spotify over AI concerns and transparency failures.

Half a million Spotify listeners just got punked by artificial intelligence. The Velvet Sundown looked like your typical indie darlings—moody band photos, carefully crafted backstory, that perfectly imperfect sound screaming “we practice in someone’s garage.” None of it was real. The photos were AI-generated. The bio was fabricated. The music came from Suno, an AI generator that cranks out radio-ready tracks faster than you can say “authenticity crisis.”

Your favorite streaming algorithm didn’t catch it either. Social media sleuths did the heavy lifting, spotting telltale signs of synthetic content while The Velvet Sundown’s creators doubled down on their denials. Then Andrew Frelon stepped forward, claiming responsibility for the elaborate hoax designed to expose Spotify’s AI blindness.

The Deception Gets Deeper

Plot twist: Frelon later admitted he was lying about his involvement, adding another layer to this digital hall of mirrors. The real creators? Still unknown. Meanwhile, indie band CVCC pulled their entire catalog from Spotify in protest, joining artists who refuse to compete with AI-generated content flooding the platform.

Red Flags That Spot AI Music:

  • Suspiciously perfect production quality from “unknown” artists.
  • Generic band photos that look too polished or slightly off.
  • Limited social media presence or engagement despite high streaming numbers.
  • Vague backstories without specific location details or verifiable history.
  • Songs that sound professionally mixed but lack human imperfections.

“There are no protections against it happening, and probably from Spotify’s business point of view it’s not even clear that this is a bad thing to be ‘protected’ against.”

— Glenn McDonald, Former Spotify Data Analyst

Your Streaming Experience Just Changed Forever

You’re essentially paying for a service that can’t distinguish between human creativity and algorithmic output—and apparently doesn’t want to. This isn’t just about one fake band gaming the system. You’re witnessing the collapse of digital authenticity in real-time. Every playlist recommendation, every “discover weekly” suggestion, every artist you stumble across could be synthetic.

The technology exists, the platforms won’t police it, and the economics favor AI over human capital. Your streaming experience just became a game of “guess what’s real,” and the house always wins.

Share this

At Gadget Review, our guides, reviews, and news are driven by thorough human expertise and use our Trust Rating system and the True Score. AI assists in refining our editorial process, ensuring that every article is engaging, clear and succinct. See how we write our content here →