Test Review

2.7
Expert Rating

Almost since their inception, sonic toothbrushes have been released into two distinct categories: expensive and powerful, or cheap and useless. This is because the machinery required to make the sonic “non-contact cleaning” effect work usually costs well above the same parts you’d see on an oscillating model. This meant that the gold-standard brushes like those released by Phillips under the Sonicare brand were often out of the price range of your average brusher.

But now the BURST sonic toothbrush is looking to change all that with its discounted price, subscription-based brush head sales, and dentist-recommended distribution scheme. But does the brush live up to the hype? Read on in my BURST Sonic Toothbrush Review to find out!

Overview

Availability: Now
Price: $69.99 direct, $39.99 through dental offices

Summary: The BURST brush makes a lot of promises and offers a cheap subscription model for head replacements, but fails to deliver where it really matters: cleaning power.

What We Liked

  • Cheap heads through subscription
  • Sleek design

What We Didn’t

  • Terrible results on the egg test
  • Some may not like the subscribe-only purchase scheme
  • No pressure sensor
  • Can’t compete with comparatively-priced Sonicare models

 
Burst Sonic Toothbrush
Brushing Modes3
Vibrations Per Minute33,000
Built-in Bluetooth
Pressure Sensor
Brush Heads Included1
Battery Life4 weeks

Design

burst brush design
The BURST brush’s design is sleek and holds well in the hand.

The BURST brush is a brand new sonic toothbrush that just went on sale late last year, and as we’d expect with a product this new it also features many modern design accents that set it apart from the pack. The BURST has a sleek feel in the hand, with just the right amount of grip thanks to its diamond-latticed bottom. The BURST comes in either white or matte black color schemes, and has three setting LEDs draped down the front.

The charging station is about as minimal as it gets, utilizing a perfectly square holder that doesn’t take up much space and plugs directly into any USB port or the included USB wall-block. The one neat innovation here is the removable cover that sits on top of the charging unit itself, designed to catch any drips or leftover toothpaste and can be easily washed independently of the charger or thrown into the dishwasher for quick cleanup.

Brushing Performance

The BURST features three brushing modes (whitening, sensitive, and massage), as well as a quadpacer timer that vibrates every 30 seconds to let you know to change to another section of your mouth. It advertises around four weeks of usage on a single charge, which is just about standard for this type of brush in most testing scenarios.

The BURST’s primary selling point is that it offers a professional-level clean for a pauper-level price, fueled by a motor that achieves up to 33,000 sonic vibrations per minute. The rub of the whole thing though? The comparatively priced Philips Sonicare ProtectiveClean 5100 nearly doubles that output for the exact same price as the BURST with its own 62,000 VPM motor (and the Philips comes with a pressure sensor too).

As we’ve done with all the electric toothbrushes tested here at Gadget Review, to find out just how much cleaning power the BURST has we stained an egg in coffee for a week and then ran the brush along the shell for 30 seconds to simulate one quadrant of a brushing cycle. We also used the brush ourselves to get a more subjective feel of how clean our teeth felt before and after using the brush, and in both these tests the BURST fell totally flat on its face.

burst brush performance
The BURST had abysmal performance on our egg test, showing no improvement at all.

Normally we would include two pictures above, representing the before and after results of how well the BURST did in the egg test. But we only needed one this time around, because even after extending the brush time an extra 30 seconds there was literally no difference in how the egg looked after we were finished.

More dedicated readers might know that during our tests for the Best Electric Toothbrush of 2018 roundup we almost always saw improved results from oscillating brushes compared to the sonic variant, but even then at leas the sonic brushes we tested then did something. Similarly when brushing my teeth with the BURST I couldn’t really even tell if it was working beyond what you’d get with a standard non-electric toothbrush, most likely due to the fact that its motor — despite being touted as a great deal for the price — was less than half as powerful as the competition in this price bracket.

Conclusion

While I was excited to try out the BURST and was interested to see if it could deliver on all its promises, I was sorely disappointed to find that it barely even made a dent in my dental hygiene, and couldn’t even scratch the surface of our coffee-stained egg. Ultimately there have been studies which prove that if you’re shopping on a budget you’re always going to get more cleaning power out of an oscillating brush than a sonic brush, and as we mentioned above this is simply down to the cost of parts to bring each type of brush to their full potential.

If you’re determined to go the sonic route and have $69.99 to spend, you’re much better off going with the 62,000 VPM motor found on the Philips Sonicare ProtectiveClean 5100 (plus you don’t have to sign up for any subscription models which charges $6.00 every three months to replace the head). BURST is merely a case of sleek design and nonsense marketing, and very little innovation to be found on the actual product itself.

Performance
Design
Value
Reader Rating0 Votes0
2.7
Expert Rating
Bottom Line

Christen Costa

Grew up back East, got sick of the cold and headed West. Since I was small I have been pushing buttons - both electronic and human. With an insatiable need for tech I thought "why not start a blog focusing on technology, and use my dislikes and likes to post on gadgets."

Related Articles

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Performance
Design
Value
Final Score

Back to top button
Close