<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>GadgetReview &#187; Inner city Bike</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.gadgetreview.com/tag/inner-city-bike/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.gadgetreview.com</link>
	<description>Your Source for Gadget News, Reviews and Deals</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 02:10:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
		<item>
		<title>Inner City Bike Designed Without Rider In Mind</title>
		<link>http://www.gadgetreview.com/2009/11/inner-city-bike-designed-without-rider-in-mind.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.gadgetreview.com/2009/11/inner-city-bike-designed-without-rider-in-mind.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 18:11:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jeff B</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Fitness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bicycle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fixed gear]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Inner city Bike]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gadgetreview.com/?p=40840</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[OK, so while this bike looks interesting enough, it also looks really for lack of a better adjective, stupid.  With the last decade seeing rise to the fixed gear bike (much to my disdain), this bike seems to absolutely epitomize [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-40841" src="http://www.gadgetreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/inner-city-bike-1.jpg" alt="inner-city-bike-1" width="450" height="481" /></p>
<p>OK, so while this bike looks interesting enough, it also looks really for lack of a better adjective, stupid.  With the last decade seeing rise to the fixed gear bike (much to my disdain), this bike seems to absolutely epitomize that design mindset with a little impracticality thrown in for bad measure.</p>
<p style="text-align: center"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-40842" src="http://www.gadgetreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/inner-city-bike-2.jpg" alt="inner-city-bike-2" width="450" height="299" /></p>
<p>Looking at the picture of the dude sitting on this I can&#8217;t possibly fathom how you could want to ride this for more than a few blocks.  He looks pretty poised to take a dive off the front of the thing as soon as he hits a bump.  The only thing inner city about this bike is how ghetto it is.  What do we think?</p>
<p><a title="Inner City Bike" href="http://www.geekologie.com/2009/11/inner_city_bike_sports_no_chai.php" target="_blank">Read</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gadgetreview.com/2009/11/inner-city-bike-designed-without-rider-in-mind.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

