<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>GadgetReview &#187; big screen tv ban</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.gadgetreview.com/tag/big-screen-tv-ban/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.gadgetreview.com</link>
	<description>Your Source for Gadget News, Reviews and Deals</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 02:10:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
		<item>
		<title>California&#8217;s Big Screen Ban Both Hated And Relatively Pointless</title>
		<link>http://www.gadgetreview.com/2009/09/californias-big-screen-ban-both-hated-and-relatively-pointless.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.gadgetreview.com/2009/09/californias-big-screen-ban-both-hated-and-relatively-pointless.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 14:31:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>stevea</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Displays]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HDTV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[High Def]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Home Theater]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LCD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LED]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[big screen tv]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[big screen tv ban]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sacramento]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wired]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wired gadget lab]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gadgetreview.com/?p=36530</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So in case you haven&#8217;t heard, Californian gadget buffs, there&#8217;s a push on in Sacramento to ban certain types of big screen TV that use too much energy.  Of course, by &#8220;certain types&#8221;, I mean roughly a quarter of all [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center;"><img class="size-full wp-image-36531  aligncenter" src="http://www.gadgetreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/big-screen-tv.jpg" alt="big-screen-tv" width="600" height="300" /></p>
<p>So in case you haven&#8217;t heard, Californian gadget buffs, there&#8217;s a push on in Sacramento to ban certain types of big screen TV that use too much energy.  Of course, by &#8220;certain types&#8221;, I mean roughly a quarter of all TVs in production today and every single plasma TV over sixty inches.  Needless to say, the people are not happy about this, and small businesses are firing back also, but perhaps the worst news came today with a simple pronouncement from Wired Magazine&#8217;s Gadget Lab that declared that such a law would be useless within two years, as &#8220;energy hogging TVs&#8221; would be gone by then anyway, thrown over in favor of LCD and &#8220;greener&#8221; TVs.</p>
<p>Basically, California&#8217;s planning to blow a bunch of money it doesn&#8217;t have to make a law it can&#8217;t enforce that&#8217;ll be rendered moot in two years anyway when the kind of TV it would ban can&#8217;t be found on the market.</p>
<p>Way to go, California legislature!  Best start checking the want ads&#8211;come November I&#8217;d be plenty of you will be run out on a rail.</p>
<p><a title="Wired's proof of big screen ban's uselessness" href="http://www.wired.com/gadgetlab/2009/03/california-tv/" target="_blank">Read</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gadgetreview.com/2009/09/californias-big-screen-ban-both-hated-and-relatively-pointless.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

