<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: LaCie Sound² Speakers Review</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.gadgetreview.com/2009/11/lacie-sound%c2%b2-speakers-review.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.gadgetreview.com/2009/11/lacie-sound%c2%b2-speakers-review.html</link>
	<description>Your Source for Gadget News, Reviews and Deals</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 12:01:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: PT44</title>
		<link>http://www.gadgetreview.com/2009/11/lacie-sound%c2%b2-speakers-review.html/comment-page-1#comment-1087678</link>
		<dc:creator>PT44</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Dec 2010 15:55:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gadgetreview.com/?p=40940#comment-1087678</guid>
		<description>I am just about to buy these speakers based on another review. Strange that this one differs so greatly from the WhatHi-Fi review. As I&#039;ve been reading that magazine for well over 20 years and their reviews are always totally unbiased and based purely on sound quality, leaves me wondering why this review scores them so badly. Will be interesting to hear them in the flesh.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.whathifi.com/review/lacie-sound2&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.whathifi.com/review...&lt;/a&gt;/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am just about to buy these speakers based on another review. Strange that this one differs so greatly from the WhatHi-Fi review. As I&#39;ve been reading that magazine for well over 20 years and their reviews are always totally unbiased and based purely on sound quality, leaves me wondering why this review scores them so badly. Will be interesting to hear them in the flesh.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.whathifi.com/review/lacie-sound2" rel="nofollow">http://www.whathifi.com/review&#8230;</a>/</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LaCie Sound² Speakers Review &#171; Product Review Source</title>
		<link>http://www.gadgetreview.com/2009/11/lacie-sound%c2%b2-speakers-review.html/comment-page-1#comment-887452</link>
		<dc:creator>LaCie Sound² Speakers Review &#171; Product Review Source</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 08:06:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gadgetreview.com/?p=40940#comment-887452</guid>
		<description>[...] Neil Poulton is known for some jaw dropping industrial design, so when they once again teamed up with Lacie to bring us the Sound² Speakers I was more than pleased with outcome, aesthetically speaking of course. But, as they say, you can&#8217;t judge a book by its cover.  So do the LaCie Sound² Speakers live up to all their meant to be? (more&#8230;) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Neil Poulton is known for some jaw dropping industrial design, so when they once again teamed up with Lacie to bring us the Sound² Speakers I was more than pleased with outcome, aesthetically speaking of course. But, as they say, you can&#8217;t judge a book by its cover.  So do the LaCie Sound² Speakers live up to all their meant to be? (more&#8230;) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

