<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Hulu Is About To Screw You&#8230;By Charging You</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.gadgetreview.com/2009/10/hulu-is-about-to-screw-you-by-charging-you.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.gadgetreview.com/2009/10/hulu-is-about-to-screw-you-by-charging-you.html</link>
	<description>Your Source for Gadget News, Reviews and Deals</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 22:16:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.gadgetreview.com/2009/10/hulu-is-about-to-screw-you-by-charging-you.html/comment-page-1#comment-877582</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 05:32:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gadgetreview.com/?p=39260#comment-877582</guid>
		<description>I would stop using hulu, personally.  I cancelled my cable because I couldn&#039;t afford it and there were alternative ways of watching the shows I enjoy.  If they begin to charge, I&#039;d rather not watch at all....so youdonut, shame on you for thinking we&#039;re freeloaders.  Some have had to find ways to afford to pay other bills that we have (paying my health care bills is more important than cable television).  $49 dollars is a lot of money to those of us living to the very last penny at the end of the month, especially in the economy we live in (that&#039;s 2 tanks of gas...not even).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would stop using hulu, personally.  I cancelled my cable because I couldn&#8217;t afford it and there were alternative ways of watching the shows I enjoy.  If they begin to charge, I&#8217;d rather not watch at all&#8230;.so youdonut, shame on you for thinking we&#8217;re freeloaders.  Some have had to find ways to afford to pay other bills that we have (paying my health care bills is more important than cable television).  $49 dollars is a lot of money to those of us living to the very last penny at the end of the month, especially in the economy we live in (that&#8217;s 2 tanks of gas&#8230;not even).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: YouDonut</title>
		<link>http://www.gadgetreview.com/2009/10/hulu-is-about-to-screw-you-by-charging-you.html/comment-page-1#comment-872929</link>
		<dc:creator>YouDonut</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 16:41:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gadgetreview.com/?p=39260#comment-872929</guid>
		<description>Ever heard of TV Everywhere?  If you have cable you&#039;ll have access to Hulu and other sites they call that &quot;entitlement.&quot;  Most of America has cable, therefore most will continue to have rights to stream online for free.  The &lt;10% of the US that has no cable service gets &quot;screwed&quot; as you say, but in reality they need to stop freeloading and figure out a way to pay $49 bucks for a basic cable package.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ever heard of TV Everywhere?  If you have cable you&#8217;ll have access to Hulu and other sites they call that &#8220;entitlement.&#8221;  Most of America has cable, therefore most will continue to have rights to stream online for free.  The &lt;10% of the US that has no cable service gets &quot;screwed&quot; as you say, but in reality they need to stop freeloading and figure out a way to pay $49 bucks for a basic cable package.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Not really...</title>
		<link>http://www.gadgetreview.com/2009/10/hulu-is-about-to-screw-you-by-charging-you.html/comment-page-1#comment-872753</link>
		<dc:creator>Not really...</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 09:08:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gadgetreview.com/?p=39260#comment-872753</guid>
		<description>See, what they want to do is transplant the cable model onto the internet. I&#039;m not a big fan of the cable model on television - we already have to pay twice for our shows, once by watching commercials, another by paying each month for a large number of channels, most of which they bundle and we don&#039;t watch.
Frankly, I can just use bit-torrent as an alternative, and if they start charging, thats what I&#039;ll do.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>See, what they want to do is transplant the cable model onto the internet. I&#8217;m not a big fan of the cable model on television &#8211; we already have to pay twice for our shows, once by watching commercials, another by paying each month for a large number of channels, most of which they bundle and we don&#8217;t watch.</p>
<p>Frankly, I can just use bit-torrent as an alternative, and if they start charging, thats what I&#8217;ll do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

