<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: KeyPhantom USB Keylogger</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.gadgetreview.com/2005/12/keyphantom-usb-keylogger.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.gadgetreview.com/2005/12/keyphantom-usb-keylogger.html</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 20:58:56 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Martin</title>
		<link>http://www.gadgetreview.com/2005/12/keyphantom-usb-keylogger.html/comment-page-1#comment-120856</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jul 2007 13:07:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gadgetreview.com/2005/12/keyphantom-usb-keylogger.html#comment-120856</guid>
		<description>check out this great keyloggers : www.keylogger-keyloggers.com !!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>check out this great keyloggers : <a href="http://www.keylogger-keyloggers.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.keylogger-keyloggers.com</a> !!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BTS</title>
		<link>http://www.gadgetreview.com/2005/12/keyphantom-usb-keylogger.html/comment-page-1#comment-62492</link>
		<dc:creator>BTS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2007 15:21:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gadgetreview.com/2005/12/keyphantom-usb-keylogger.html#comment-62492</guid>
		<description>Will it work on a wireless USB Keyboard.  I have been trying but cannot get it to work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Will it work on a wireless USB Keyboard.  I have been trying but cannot get it to work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://www.gadgetreview.com/2005/12/keyphantom-usb-keylogger.html/comment-page-1#comment-40767</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Feb 2007 00:16:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gadgetreview.com/2005/12/keyphantom-usb-keylogger.html#comment-40767</guid>
		<description>I see KeyCarbon have released thier PCI logger... what happend to yours KeyGhost?  You know the one you said that &quot;Units are in pre-production testing&quot; about 6 months ago... after you discovered your competitor was making one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I see KeyCarbon have released thier PCI logger&#8230; what happend to yours KeyGhost?  You know the one you said that &#8220;Units are in pre-production testing&#8221; about 6 months ago&#8230; after you discovered your competitor was making one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://www.gadgetreview.com/2005/12/keyphantom-usb-keylogger.html/comment-page-1#comment-1123</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Apr 2006 13:33:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gadgetreview.com/2005/12/keyphantom-usb-keylogger.html#comment-1123</guid>
		<description>If you look at the KEYPhantom website now, it does have forensic units for sale.  So not vapourware.  Looks like wishful thinking from a competitor there.  And i&#039;ll be up front here, I have worked for keyphantom, and now that I don&#039;t I can actually reply to these... who is the anonymous poster?

Speaking of &#039;maybe&#039; vapour, how is the PCI logger that&#039;s in pre-production testing going?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you look at the KEYPhantom website now, it does have forensic units for sale.  So not vapourware.  Looks like wishful thinking from a competitor there.  And i&#8217;ll be up front here, I have worked for keyphantom, and now that I don&#8217;t I can actually reply to these&#8230; who is the anonymous poster?</p>
<p>Speaking of &#8216;maybe&#8217; vapour, how is the PCI logger that&#8217;s in pre-production testing going?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.gadgetreview.com/2005/12/keyphantom-usb-keylogger.html/comment-page-1#comment-173</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2006 09:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gadgetreview.com/2005/12/keyphantom-usb-keylogger.html#comment-173</guid>
		<description>No you are wrong mr phantom!

KeyGhost does works on 100% of USB keyboards, and has done since june 2005. 

How come the KeyPhantom website advertises the &#039;forensic&#039; version with time and date stamping, then puts in a bullet point note saying &quot;Date/time stamping of keystrokes in the log (firmware upgrade to support this option planned for release in 2006Q1&quot;?
Maybe keyphantom is peddling vapourware products in beta release (look out for the bug-fix firmware updates ;) ... but let&#039;s leave this to your phantom customers to find out...

In the mean time, KeyGhost will always release consistantly better products.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No you are wrong mr phantom!</p>
<p>KeyGhost does works on 100% of USB keyboards, and has done since june 2005. </p>
<p>How come the KeyPhantom website advertises the &#8216;forensic&#8217; version with time and date stamping, then puts in a bullet point note saying &#8220;Date/time stamping of keystrokes in the log (firmware upgrade to support this option planned for release in 2006Q1&#8243;?<br />
Maybe keyphantom is peddling vapourware products in beta release (look out for the bug-fix firmware updates ;) &#8230; but let&#8217;s leave this to your phantom customers to find out&#8230;</p>
<p>In the mean time, KeyGhost will always release consistantly better products.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.gadgetreview.com/2005/12/keyphantom-usb-keylogger.html/comment-page-1#comment-172</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2006 20:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gadgetreview.com/2005/12/keyphantom-usb-keylogger.html#comment-172</guid>
		<description>Actually, the previous blogger was misinformed - the keylogger from www.keyphantom.com was the worlds first USB keylogger to work on 100% of USB keyboards. 

The KeyPhantom USB Corporate SE has 1568Mb of memory - that&#039;s 1,500,000 keystrokes!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, the previous blogger was misinformed &#8211; the keylogger from <a href="http://www.keyphantom.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.keyphantom.com</a> was the worlds first USB keylogger to work on 100% of USB keyboards. </p>
<p>The KeyPhantom USB Corporate SE has 1568Mb of memory &#8211; that&#8217;s 1,500,000 keystrokes!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.gadgetreview.com/2005/12/keyphantom-usb-keylogger.html/comment-page-1#comment-171</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2006 12:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gadgetreview.com/2005/12/keyphantom-usb-keylogger.html#comment-171</guid>
		<description>As for phantom being the first USB keylogger, someone has been misinformed. KeyGhost released the world&#039;s first usb keylogger over a year ago. KeyGhost USB Keylogger 128KB came out of beta for full release in June 05 as a small length of cable. KeyGhost has just released their next version which looks like a cool little thumb drive. It doesn&#039;t show up as an extra hub in your device manager either. They already have the higher memory capacities too with 128-bit encryption. Head over to www.keyghost.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As for phantom being the first USB keylogger, someone has been misinformed. KeyGhost released the world&#8217;s first usb keylogger over a year ago. KeyGhost USB Keylogger 128KB came out of beta for full release in June 05 as a small length of cable. KeyGhost has just released their next version which looks like a cool little thumb drive. It doesn&#8217;t show up as an extra hub in your device manager either. They already have the higher memory capacities too with 128-bit encryption. Head over to <a href="http://www.keyghost.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.keyghost.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.gadgetreview.com/2005/12/keyphantom-usb-keylogger.html/comment-page-1#comment-170</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jan 2006 19:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gadgetreview.com/2005/12/keyphantom-usb-keylogger.html#comment-170</guid>
		<description>If you look at their webpage (www.keyphantom.com), you&#039;ll see some bigger capacity models are comming out. That said, usually you&#039;d know if you lost something before the 2 week buffer started overflowing anyway.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you look at their webpage (www.keyphantom.com), you&#8217;ll see some bigger capacity models are comming out. That said, usually you&#8217;d know if you lost something before the 2 week buffer started overflowing anyway.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.gadgetreview.com/2005/12/keyphantom-usb-keylogger.html/comment-page-1#comment-169</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Dec 2005 01:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gadgetreview.com/2005/12/keyphantom-usb-keylogger.html#comment-169</guid>
		<description>Oops, hit the &quot;publish&quot; button twice. Wish there was some way to delete a published blog on this site, but hey, I didn&#039;t have time to log in so I can&#039;t complain.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oops, hit the &#8220;publish&#8221; button twice. Wish there was some way to delete a published blog on this site, but hey, I didn&#8217;t have time to log in so I can&#8217;t complain.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.gadgetreview.com/2005/12/keyphantom-usb-keylogger.html/comment-page-1#comment-168</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Dec 2005 01:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gadgetreview.com/2005/12/keyphantom-usb-keylogger.html#comment-168</guid>
		<description>This post has been removed by a blog administrator.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This post has been removed by a blog administrator.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.gadgetreview.com/2005/12/keyphantom-usb-keylogger.html/comment-page-1#comment-167</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Dec 2005 01:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gadgetreview.com/2005/12/keyphantom-usb-keylogger.html#comment-167</guid>
		<description>Yeah, its a pretty neat little device.  My lab partner at Uni lost two weeks work on his thesis, and got one of these to stop it happening again. It arrived 3 days ago, and has been working nicely ever since.

I would personally have purchased a USB thumb drive, cause they&#039;re cheaper for a uni student like me. But, you have to regularly drag your files to the thumb drive, unlike the keyphantom which always has a backup, no matter what you&#039;ve typed. I would also like to see them up the memory on the device, 128Kb is a lot (128,000 keystrokes), but it would be nice to have something like 256,000 keystrokes on the base model instead.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, its a pretty neat little device.  My lab partner at Uni lost two weeks work on his thesis, and got one of these to stop it happening again. It arrived 3 days ago, and has been working nicely ever since.</p>
<p>I would personally have purchased a USB thumb drive, cause they&#8217;re cheaper for a uni student like me. But, you have to regularly drag your files to the thumb drive, unlike the keyphantom which always has a backup, no matter what you&#8217;ve typed. I would also like to see them up the memory on the device, 128Kb is a lot (128,000 keystrokes), but it would be nice to have something like 256,000 keystrokes on the base model instead.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
